User talk:Kat mano

Speedy deletion nomination of A2z Support

Hello Kat mano,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged A2z Support for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 22:36, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, before I explain, let me note that I can undelete the content if you want, and then move it to your userspace for improvement if you want. Would you like this? If so, let me know and I'll do it, and please remember that I'm available for questions and general help if you need it. My reason for deleting ‎A2z Support was basically that it was quite promotional and not the kind of neutral, emotionally-detached writing with which encyclopedia articles are supposed to be written. I understand that the contents weren't "Buy our services, because it will help your business!" or anything like that, but still the contents were a mix of subjective things showing why the company is good (e.g. "From the onset, the idea behind the A2z Support was...") and factual things about the company's services like the blogs that it runs, things that don't help you understand the company unless you're a would-be customer. Final analogy: if you were writing a two-paragraph article about Microsoft, you probably wouldn't include components like "The company offers online support for its products" (even though it's true) or "Microsoft's mission has been to enable people and businesses throughout the world to realize their full potential" (even though, again, it's true). But again, I'll be happy to help you figure out how to write better, if you'd like. Nyttend (talk) 23:23, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will look forward to change the contents you have mentioned dear , Thanks for teaching me , i will be further to you. Kindly un-delete the page so i move forward to edit it. Kat mano (talk)

I will do improvements in it , i am new still happy i have made a page. kindly teach me as well as tell me what to do with the contents to be removed. or else you please delete the contents that looks promotional. Thanks dear Nyttend Kat mano (talk) 23:32, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 23:16, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kat mano (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What is sockpuppet ?? How am i ? Who is asimbwp ? Kat mano (talk) 23:20, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your account is Confirmed. I've revoked your access to this Talk page. If you wish to say something, do so (civilly) at the master account's Talk page. Bbb23 (talk) 23:59, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

For posterity That's why i make the I.D Kat Mano. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:37, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]