User talk:Kason12271

November 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, RWBY Chibi, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 02:03, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pucca (TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 04:20, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pffffff Kason12271 (talk) 04:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

THATS IT IM REPORTING YOU Kason12271 (talk) 04:36, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Amazing Digital Circus, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 23:15, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at RWBY Chibi, you may be blocked from editing. Please see WP:BURDEN Waxworker (talk) 16:12, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bruh if i get blocked from editng, I will hijack every account! Espilsliy You! Kason12271 (talk) 04:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kason12271. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:The Crystalline Gamerz, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:02, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Miraculous: Tales of Ladybug & Cat Noir. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:44, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I TOLD WAXWOKER IM GONNA HIJACK EVERY ACCOUNT IF I GET BLOCKED FROM EDITNG! PLEASE LET ME EDIT THINGS RIGHT NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW NOOOOOWWWWWWWWW!!!!! Kason12271 (talk) 04:38, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Crystalline Gamerz (January 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by 1AmNobody24 were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Crystalline Gamerz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nobody (talk) 07:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kason12271! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nobody (talk) 07:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Crystalline Gamerz (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TechnoSquirrel69 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Crystalline Gamerz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:02, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR I STILL DONT CARE Kason12271 (talk) 21:52, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Draft:The Crystalline Gamerz while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

bruh. didint i tell you from 18 days ago Kason12271 (talk) 21:48, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kason12271, I'm warning you for the last time to stop your disruptive editing behavior on this page. You have been consistently altering or removing templates against Wikipedia guidelines or established processes, and communicating with other users who try to reason with you in a disparaging, unproductive demeanor. Since you've made it clear you would like to opt out of the AfC process and have not submitted your draft again, I have decided not to reinstate those tags. However, you have given no response to my and other editors' questions about your conflict of interest with the subject. I don't have any interest in escalating this situation to the level of administrator intervention, as that will most likely end with sanctions placed against you. However, you're leaving me no other option if you continue like this. Please take a moment to reconsider your approach to contribute for constructively to the project. If you have any questions about that, feel free to let me know. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:05, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SHUT UP AND I DONT CARE Kason12271 (talk) 22:07, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.GraziePrego (talk) 00:13, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Acroterion (talk) 00:31, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The Crystalline Gamerz

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Draft:The Crystalline Gamerz, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:27, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]