User talk:Kashmirian-21th

This is Kashmirian-21th's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

March 2024

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:15, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks for the reminder. Actually, I didn't log out. While editing the article, my browser switched to desktop mode, which made my account invisible. But I still remember it. Sorry for the inconvenience."

Thankyou Kashmirian-21th (talk) 05:23, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aliabad Saria (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 14 novembre was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aliabad Saria and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

14 novembre (talk) 12:32, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kashmirian-21th! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 14 novembre (talk) 12:32, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Goti Pora has been accepted

Goti Pora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:55, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

I'll make sure to throw away all of your contributions. --Yamla (talk) 15:53, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kashmirian-21th (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am requesting here to unblock my account as I didn't violate Wikipedias policy, as per your reason mentioned above that I am sockpuppt of any waheed person, please that is misconfuse to you.. hope you understand this concept, I don't have any link to this person even I don't know him as personally or anywhere, but I visited his page I saw multiple accounts of him but surely I dont have any link with him ... :Please review my unblock as I do not know him, and check my edits as well and see is their any mistake in creating an these editsKashmirian-21th (talk) 16:04, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If we unblocked everybody we blocked for sockpuppetry who denied that they were a sockpuppet, then we ought not to have a sockpuppetry policy because no block for it would ever stick. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Kashmirian-21th (talk) 16:04, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sir Daniel Case

please review my account, check my logs, edits etc...as I don't have any connection with this, please unblock me, please...

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kashmirian-21th (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please I have already given an reason, but I request review my logs,edits, etc... I have no connection to this person, please review my account and unblock me.... Kashmirian-21th (talk) 08:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The review has already been done(Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Waheed Challa/Archive). It certainly could be that you are a different individual, but that would only make this meat puppetry, which is treated the same. You'll need to explain why you were recreating the same articles as a blocked user if you have nothing to do with them. 331dot (talk) 15:29, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblocking request

Hi 331dot, you have reviewed my unblocking request,thanks for it

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kashmirian-21th (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am here again to request unblocking because I don't have any link with this person. As per your declining reason, I recreated his article. Now, I checked the name of the recreating article and found it was Draft:Dreri Kali Pora. Yes, I will tell you why I recreated it. When I joined Wikipedia, I edited without creating an account. Later, I received a message to create an account, which I did, and started writing articles according to Wikipedia's policy. I'm from Shopian, Kashmir, India, and I realized I could create articles about Shopian's villages with accurate descriptions to help people learn about them. I began writing articles about villages with high populations from Shopian. First, I wrote an article about Goti Pora. Then, I started another one, Draft:Dreri Kali Pora, but unfortunately, I got blocked. Additionally, I started writing articles about some Sufis because I was interested in sharing information about them and the villages, which would be helpful for readers. Thank you. I hope you consider my appeal. Kashmirian-21th (talk) 10:57, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.