User talk:KashmirValleyEditor

Welcome!

Hello, KashmirValleyEditor!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:59, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Muzamil Mahmood Dar has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Muzamil Mahmood Dar. Thanks! bonadea contributions talk 07:59, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Important: doing the above does not guarantee that the draft will be accepted, but it will help the reviewer (and it must be done if the draft is to be accepted.) --bonadea contributions talk 08:02, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 18:18, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KashmirValleyEditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It took me lot of time to check why i have been blocked & how to appeal it after getting a block email i was literally shocked. I want to make it clear i have never used Wikipedia before as you can check i am still in learning stage. I always tried to follow Wikipedia guidelines, i never violated any guideline. I want to add the football related articles on Wikipedia and i had already conveyed this to one of a administrator that i am currently creating a few drafts related to football (not yet updated on Wikipedia). I think i don't deserve to be blocked i haven't yet done that much of edits and i have till now submitted only 1 draft to AFC. I am still new here & i never made any violation. I am clueless how i have been accused of sockpuppet. ✓ I again want to make it clear this is my only account i am not using any other account nor i have used Wikipedia before. ✓ Kindly unblock me and i guarantee you i will try to find out what i did wrong and i will never repeat that mistake. I hope i will be unblocked. KashmirValleyEditor (talk) 04:00, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You edited about a topic that someone else attempted to edit about and was blocked. Anyone else attempting to edit about that same topic will be blocked as a sockpuppet even if they actually haven't used multiple accounts- we call this meat puppetry. If you are not associated with any other accounts or other efforts to edit about this person, please tell us how you came to edit about them and what edits you intend to make going forward. 331dot (talk) 09:31, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Requesting for unblock

@331dot:

I wasn't aware that my account will be blocked because of this action. I just wanted to improve the football related content of my state on Wikipedia. And i have completed around 6 articles, i was about to make draft of those articles (all the articles related to football). The draft which i submitted to AFC is related to a subject engaged at the top level of football in our state. I found that his article is already available on many other websites of encyclopedia organisations(available on google search) and i thought it will be accepted on Wikipedia also. I got all the sources and information quickly about that subject on wikitia, bharatpedia etc and this is the reason i submitted it. I am still preparing the other 6 articles related to football.

✓ I am still new to the Wikipedia, i have learned a bit till now on youtube. There might have been some violations from my side but i assure you those are unintentional.

It is my dream to work on the Wikipedia i am continuously increasing my knowledge related to Wikipedia. Please unblock my account i assure you there will be no violation of Wikipedia policies from myside now onwards. (KashmirValleyEditor (talk) 10:45, 11 May 2023 (UTC)).[reply]

You may make another request for someone else to review. It is sometimes difficult to edit in areas where the subject has an interest in promotion. My suggestion would be that you agree to at least temporarily refrain from editing about football players.

Most of the sources you describe are not acceptable sources. 331dot (talk) 10:49, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KashmirValleyEditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wasn't aware that my account will be blocked because of this action. I just wanted to improve the football related content of my state on Wikipedia. And i have completed around 6 articles, i was about to make draft of those articles (all the articles related to football). The draft which i submitted to AFC is related to a subject engaged at the top level of football in our state. I found that his article is already available on many other websites of encyclopedia organisations(available on google search) and i thought it will be accepted on Wikipedia also. I got all the sources and information quickly about that subject on wikitia, bharatpedia etc and this is the reason i submitted it. I am still preparing the other 6 articles related to football. I am still new to the Wikipedia, i have learned a bit till now on youtube. There might have been some violations from my side but i assure you those are unintentional. It is my dream to work on the Wikipedia i am continuously increasing my knowledge related to Wikipedia. Please unblock my account i assure you there will be no violation of Wikipedia policies from myside now onwards.

Decline reason:

Confirmed to Muzamil Mahmood at least. That user declared a conflict of interest releated to Muzamil Mahmood Dar. You edited a draft article about that person. Clear case of WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 11:34, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

@Yamla:

I am again saying that I'm not the case of WP:SOCK.

Neither i have edited for any person nor i am promoting anyone. I have just started using Wikipedia. I'm totally confused how can you declare me SOCK without listening to me.

I am again declaring i just wanted to expand the football related information on Wikipedia. But it isn't an easy task. I'm being falsely associated with the things I'm not related to in anyway.

Kindly unblock me i will never edit Wikipedia now onwards. I dont wanna go with the blocked tag.

KashmirValleyEditor (talk) 12:58, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You very clearly stated, "i never violated any guideline". I investigated and determined you did indeed violate WP:SOCK. You are free to make a new unblock request, but falsely claiming you did not violate WP:SOCK isn't going to work. Now is the time to try honesty. --Yamla (talk) 13:02, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I already mentioned earlier that i am still new to Wikipedia, i might have violated any guideline but it is unintentional. KashmirValleyEditor (talk) 13:05, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KashmirValleyEditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I mentioned everything in my previous unblock requests but all in vain.

I request now kindly unblock me i will not edit untill i will learn everything about Wikipedia. No one is listening I'm continuously saying " i am still new to Wikipedia i might have violated any guideline but it is unintentional.

Kindly unblock now. I will only edit Wikipedia after gaining full knowledge. KashmirValleyEditor (talk) 13:14, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There is little doubt in my mind that you're an undisclosed paid editor and sock puppet. I'm willing to accept that maybe you're not one of them, but I can't really see how you'd be neither. My patience for this is getting pretty low, so I've revoked your talk page access. I don't see much point in letting this go on for six repetitive unblock requests like User talk:Darzubair. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:17, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I suggest you modify this unblock request, because saying you will stop editing, means there is no need to unblock you. PhilKnight (talk) 13:43, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@PhilKnight:

Sorry, i mean until i will learn everything about Wikipedia policies. KashmirValleyEditor (talk) 13:50, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We don't need you to learn every single policy(there are many, more than you probably think; even I, an admin, haven't read them all). We need you to learn the ones relevant to your editing and be honest about having violated them. If you need time to do that, you should withdraw your request until you have done it. There is no time limit for you to request unblock, take all the time you need. 331dot (talk) 01:49, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:17, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]