User talk:Karuna138

Welcome! Hello, Karuna138, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Rajalingampet, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --sparkl_!sm ^hey! 07:45, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rajalingampet

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. --sparkl_!sm ^hey! 07:45, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Rajalingampet with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:03, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rajalingampet, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. You may have good reasons for the change you have made, but if so you need to explain what those reasons are. If you don't, then your repeated removal of content is likely to look to other editors like vandalism. Not only will that mean that your changes will be reverted, but it could also lead to you being blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:20, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rajalingampet, you may be blocked from editing. Yash t 101 :) 09:23, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rajalingampet, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Yash t 101 :) 09:28, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for repeated unexplained removal of content, with no attempt whatever to explain your reason, despite repeated messages about doing so. When the block expires please try to explain your edits, particularly any which have been challenged or questioned. A brief explanation can be given in the box labelled "Edit summary" below the editing area when you edit a page, and if you need a longer explanation you can give it on the article's talk page, such as Talk:Rajalingampet. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:33, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Karuna138 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear sir i am new to contributing, hence i don't know how to post which i was created with the name of "Rajalingampet". that's why i made with lots of errors ,now m rectifying them so please unbloke me Karuna138 (talk) 2:47 am, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. TN X Man 14:36, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In response to your feedback

Glad you're happy and welcome to Wikipedia! If you need help editing, check out the tutorial or ask a question at the help desk

Ariconte (talk) 03:58, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

Generally you can not protect articles. If they are being vandalized you can report it. See Wikipedia:Guide to administrator intervention against vandalism.

Ariconte (talk) 04:00, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]