User talk:Karthikiyerks

December 2018

Hello, I'm Flooded with them hundreds. I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to ISPIRT— has been undone because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thank you. Flooded with them hundreds 11:17, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The material was copied directly from another website, and thus was a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:43, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Hello, Karthikiyerks. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page ISPIRIT, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See WP:PAID. Thank you. Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:47, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to ISPIRT. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:50, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at ISPIRT. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You appear to be adding unsourced promotional content and removing citations under a WP:MINOR edit summary. Additionally you are leaving the article with broken syntax. Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:50, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello, I'm Dr.Pinsky. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to ISPIRT have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 20:16, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion, as you did at ISPIRT.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 20:32, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]