User talk:Karthikganapathy

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Lvb314 (talk) 23:40, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page The Walker School has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tiderolls 03:23, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Gender equality. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. $Thatguyflint$ ^{Talk to me!} 04:44, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Karthikganapathy: the subject of your recent edit on New South Hall is a developing story that can not, at this time, be cited for verification. In adherence to the principles of Wikipedia, please wait until an official statement is made regarding the fire before including the information on this encyclopedia. -Hoya, class of 2013 by hajatvrc 04:52, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss inclusion of the paragraph you are repeatedly re-inserting into the Buford, Georgia article on the article talk page before you add it again. I believe that you are putting undue weight on a negative event and have a conflict with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:39, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing it up on the article talk page. I have again removed the addition because I still believe that it is undue weight on a negative event. Please wait for other editors to provide their opinion upon the matter. Once a consensus is achieved, the item can either be readded, or not, into the article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:03, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]