User talk:KarlaLarraga

October 2021

Hello, I'm Hillelfrei. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Center for American and International Law—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Hillelfrei ^talk 15:51, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello KarlaLarraga. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:KarlaLarraga. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=KarlaLarraga|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 19:39, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Hey there! Nothing to hide here, I’m the comms manager for CAIL trying to be transparent and abide by y’all’s rules. Thank you giving me the option to post my suggestions for this article. My suggestions are factual (not sales or marketing copy) about CAIL, as shown below. Please le me know if this works - no more edits on my end. Most of those names (Harriet miers - Supreme Court nominee, t.l. Cubbage - worked for the dept of defense) may have related wiki pages to link to. Please let me know if this works - and please note I trying to work by your rules to the bet of my ability.

_________

The Center for American and International Law (CAIL) is an international nonprofit educational institution founded in Dallas, TX in 1947 for lawyers, judges, and law enforcement professionals.

CAIL's educational institutes have established international forums and educational gestiona for thiprogramming addressing Law Enforcement Administration (ILEA), Energy Law (IEL), International and Comparative Law (SWIICL), Transnational Arbitration (ITA), Law and Technology (ILT), Criminal Justice, and other topics.

At present, the principal policy-making body is its board of trustees. Harriet E. Miers chairs the current board, the vice-chair is Dee J. Kelly, Jr., the current chair of the executive committee is Randall M. Ebner, and the vice-chair of the executive committee is Hon. Sam A. Lindsay, the secretary, is Hon. Dale Wainwright, all of whom work with several trustees. CAIL’s current president is T.L. Cubbage. KarlaLarraga (talk) 20:01, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

“ educational gestiona for thiprogramming” should read “educational programming” KarlaLarraga (talk) 20:07, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You will need to make a formal declaration on your user page, see WP:PAID. Please understand that Wikipedia primarily summarizes what independent reliable sources say about article subjects. Nevertheless, your suggestions are welcome, please make them on the article's talk page, in the form of an edit request(click for instructions). Minor changes like fixing spelling you may do yourself. 331dot (talk) 20:09, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chairs wiki page

Harriet Miers wiki- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harriet_Miers KarlaLarraga (talk) 20:21, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert G. Storey (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Much of the content is unsourced. Also need sources that have written in-depth about him. Sources provided are largely brief mentions or what he said or has written which are not independent so cannot be used to establish notability. A start is an obituary written by a major news publication which likely exists. Also got some additional hits on JSTOR, ex "Writing the History of the SA at the International Military Tribunal: Legal Strategies and Long-term Historiographical Consequences".

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert G. Storey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Robert G. Storey, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:25, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KarlaLarraga! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 17:25, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Your edit to Draft:Robert G. Storey has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. S0091 (talk) 18:49, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

After doing some additional research, there is no doubt Storey is notable but your approach did a disservice to the article about him. S0091 (talk) 18:58, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert G. Storey has been accepted

Robert G. Storey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

(t · c) buidhe 14:40, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]