User talk:Karl47

Image copyright problem with Image:WildtreeGroupShot01lores.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:WildtreeGroupShot01lores.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:01, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Destroyed Amps

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Destroyed Amps, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Cunard (talk) 19:07, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your article

Your article was deleted on purpose. Please don't keep recreating it, unless you can include information from reliable sources explaining the significance of this band. See WP:MUSIC for some guidelines on band articles. Friday (talk) 19:22, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Zuul FX

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Zuul FX, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Zuul FX seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Zuul FX, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 04:50, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Paul Gray (American musician), you will be blocked from editing. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 21:56, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. – B.hotep •talk• 22:05, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 37 Stitches

The article 37 Stitches has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 19:34, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]