User talk:KarimMassarani
| This user is a student editor in College_of_DuPage/English_1102_NET_55_(Spring_2021) . |
Welcome
[edit]
|
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, KarimMassarani, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:14, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]Hello I am new to Wikipedia and I am learning how to use talk pages. KarimMassarani (talk) 20:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Peer Review for Draft
[edit]Tyler Goughenour-Peer Review
Lead- The lead in which you have written allowed me to have a good idea on the topic at hand due to the concise and to the point manner you possessed. It set out the draft in a nice fashion and made the confusion that comes with some drafts be irrelevant. Good job. Structure- The structure in which you laid out was good due to it following an in order representation of the Indonesian language all around.The only recommendation I have is to maybe add a bit more info as far as the little body paragraphs go within your piece due to it furthering the understanding for the reader all and all. Try combining some of the body paragraphs together in order to give it a bit more length and depth as far as the information your giving goes. This will make it that much more satisfying for the reader all and all.
Balance- The structure I feel relates to this category immensely in your case and is why ill state it again. The balance of your body paragraphs is great when compared to one another due to the length of them all being similar. Maybe just as said prior make them a bit longer in order for there to be more info for the reader to digest all and all. None the less, I thought the length of each one when compared was as good as it can be. Great job.
Neutral- I thought that your stance on the subject at the end of the day was no where near one sided and due to this stuck to a neutral viewpoint the whole way through. This is crucial to a wiki article and was good to see that you stuck with the correct format.
Sources- The sources you had given for the most part seemed efficient enough to where the information you were giving fit nicely with them when all was said and done. As far as adding more info as I had said prior, looking into more sources may help this that much more.