User talk:Karenwilson12345
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Karenwilson12345! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! ◊PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 08:35, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
July 2020
[edit]
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to School psychology—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 09:06, 5 July 2020 (UTC) The revisions were made with existing information on that page. The page now has an improved rating as part of the WikiProject Psychology and WikiProject Education initiatives. July 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to School psychology, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:11, 6 July 2020 (UTC) The revisions were made with existing information on that page. The page now has an improved rating as part of the WikiProject Psychology and WikiProject Education initiatives. July 2020
Dr. K.
[edit]Please note that disambiguation pages like Dr. K are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:
- Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
- Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
- Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
- Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
- Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
- Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory
- Do not add articles to acronym or initials disambiguation pages unless the person or entity is widely known by that name (in which case it should be stated in the linked article).
I could not find any article that mentions the drink Dr. K., so I removed it from the DAB page, Leschnei (talk) 22:59, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your input. This issue has been resolved. July 2020
July 2020
[edit] Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Qualitative_research, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:24, 9 July 2020 (UTC) The revisions made were based on existing citations on that page. The page is open to further expansion; however, simply removing all of the revisions and reverting to an older, poorer quality version appears detrimental to the page. The revisions made have led to inclusion in the WikiProject Psychology and WikiProject Sociology initiatives. The article is currently rated as Start-Class and open to further expansion. July 2020
Hello user:Karenwilson12345. Some of your edits in the psychological testing entry are problematic. For example, your edits involving criterion-referenced and norm-referenced tests are incomplete and too telescoped. Your writing needs to be both clearer and more objective. I second what user:CommanderWaterford wrote. Thank you. Iss246 (talk) 22:26, 9 July 2020 (UTC) The revisions made were based on existing citations on that page. The revisions made led to inclusion in the WikiProject Psychology initiative. The article is currently rated as Start-Class and the sections are open to further expansion. July 2020 The undone revisions by user:Oceansandsand were reversed. The revisions made led to inclusion in the WikiProject Psychology initiative. The article is currently rated as Start-Class and is open to further expansion. July 2020
Accusations
[edit]Regarding this edit summary, please provide for us the evidence of "alternate accounts" and "vandalism". I personally think you made up the accusation, but I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt if you can give us diffs or other evidence of multiple accounts and vandalism. Please read WP:VANDALISM before you respond. If these accusations are true they need to be discussed at WP:ANI. If they are not true consider this a warning about personal attacks in the form of false accusations. Pinging Iss246. Sundayclose (talk) 02:44, 13 July 2020 (UTC) After Commander Waterford made a statement lodging accusations of vandalism toward me about a different page (qualitative research), user:Iss246 concurred and began reverting revisions I made on the following pages: Psychological Testing and Specific Developmental Disorder. Any revisions I made include reasons in the edit history on each respective page. After subsequently undoing the reverted revisions by user:Iss246, user:Oceansandsand (a newly created account) started reverting my revisions. The only activity related to user:Oceansandsand are on the two pages user:Iss246 also tried to revert edits on. I'm not really sure how else you want me to expand, but you could probably just look at the edit history of each of those users as well as previous statements left on my talk page. I don't know how to look up IP addresses based on usernames, but I suppose that could also be a thing to explore. July 2020
- A content dispute is not vandalism. And the way you determine whether someone is abusing multiple accounts is to make a report at WP:SPI, not throwing around accusations in edit summaries. At this point your accusations are inappropriate. Consider yourself warned. Sundayclose (talk) 02:59, 13 July 2020 (UTC) Duly noted. July 2020
This issue was resolved per sundayclose's warning. July 2020.
Don't accuse me of being user:Oceanandsands. I don't know who that is. Whatever your disagreement is with Oceanandsand, it is independent of me. Understand that when a newcomer to WP, someone like yourself, starts making sweeping changes in entries, old hands at WP scrutinize those changes. That scrutiny is not nefarious. Scrutiny of the edits you made does not amount to anything other than editors healthily trying to understand the edits and make adjustments in the edits in the interest of accuracy and clarity.
cc: User:Sundayclose and user:Oceansandsand Iss246 (talk) 15:36, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
User:Karenwilson12345, don't tell me about my edit history on the Noticeboard. When you have been editing long enough on WP you are bound to get into disputes. The result is that the person who is making poor edits gets a longer suspension but the person whose edits are compromised often gets a suspension too, but a shorter one. A few years ago, I was in a dispute with a guy who turned out to be a destructive force in WP. It led to his getting a lifetime ban from WP. I had suspension for a few days. That can sometimes happen. I recommend that you think about your own edits. I have almost 13,000 edits. As of the writing of this paragraph, you have 366 edits. When you get as many edits as I have you can start correcting me. Iss246 (talk) 22:53, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
User:Karenwilson12345, you owe me an apology. Not just for the accusation of sockpuppetry and vandalism. I add that you accused me of reversing your edits of the qualitative research and specific developmental disorder entries. I have not changed your edits of those entries. That is not to say that I will not edit those entries in the future. But I have not changed your edits as of today. I would like to hear a heartfelt "I'm sorry" from you. Iss246 (talk) 02:45, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |