User talk:Karel dragoun

Welcome!

Hello, Karel dragoun, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Σαι ( Talk) 13:28, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Czech Branch of the House of Thurn und Taxis

I noticed the new article Czech Branch of the House of Thurn und Taxis and the many edits you made to it. I wondered why you thought it necessary to make a new article instead of making it a section to the Thurn und Taxis article which is rather devoid of detail. I also wonder how likely it is that readers will easily find the article as it is named now—I suspect the traffic will be quite low. The Thurn und Taxis article certainly needs much more work especially about the postal services. BTW, it is recommended not to overlink by adding the same link more than once to any article. I have other things going on right now, but will be happy to assist you where I can. The Czech article does not have any citations and as you know Wikipedia have been criticised for not being reliable and to this end it is necessary to not just list a few source books but also to give exact references to the details. Look at any of the featured articles to see the style recommended, or even the only philatelic FA, Postage stamps of Ireland. Hope that helps. (I post in one place to keep a discussion together, so am watching this page). Cheers ww2censor (talk) 16:58, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think this (I post in one place to keep a discussion together, so am watching this page). means? Now you have divided the discussion which I started here, I will put it back here, so it is all together. ww2censor (talk) 15:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you have made some comments and suggestions about the above article, such as expanding the existing T and T article instead of making a separate one. Please note that the T and Ts Category has 9 entries - i.e. other people found it necessary to make pages about certain descendants of the family.

Please be advised that I am neither interested in pursuing the history of philately, nor pursuing the history of postal services, because I do not know anything about them. I will attempt to add pages of sources in brackets where possible but please note that much of the information is common knowledge, quoted in multiple sources.

I must insist that the history of Czech branch of the House of T and T deserves to be told, as the only thing they share with Regensburg's Thurn und Taxis, are a few distant relatives.

Thank you for your comments.

Karel dragoun —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karel dragoun (talk • contribs) 15:24, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry but I have to tag the article as a copyright violation because it is a simple cut and paste from a copyright webpage. On that basis I am ignoring your comment above because they are now irrelevant to any discussion. If you rewrite it with proper sources, not just comments about common knowledge, it might be acceptable. ww2censor (talk) 16:22, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I already told you I discuss any issue where I start the discussion, which is here, so I am reposting your post back here as previously requested twice. Next time you post this topic on my page I will just delete it.

Many articles in Wikipedia do not use footnotes - yet they have not been deleted. And please do note that I have quoted all my sources that I used in the preparation of the page which is still a work in progress. I am the creator of the text, both in Wikipedia and on the kapralova.org, and I am simultaneously working on both. The reason, why I want to make this text available under the GFDL is to reach a larger leadership of Wikipedia; and the reason, while the page also exists on kapralova.org is that I have posted there additional images - some photos that I do not wish to share. Hope this clarifies the matter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karel dragoun (talk • contribs) 20:26, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct there are many articles that don't have citations and matter are changing, so that new article are being more closely scrutinised for sources and citations. You did not provide any, just of a list of books. That is not good enough nowadays for new articles. If you want to provide Wikipedia with the information that is on your web site you need to follow the instructions on this page for copyright owners. For the moment there is no evidence that you own the copyright for that page. There was a statement made by an unregistered user on the article talk page that claims he created the text. That won't work, if it is in fact you. I will be asking another administrator to have a look at this discussion and the article because of your alleged claim. BTW, please sign your posts. ww2censor (talk) 22:41, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have emailed permissions-en@wikimedia.org <permissions-en@wikimedia.org> to provide clarification as requested. I hope that this will settle the matter. I am still navigating through the Wikipedia maze of rules, which have indeed toughened, and trying to learn on the go. The article is also a work in progress, so let me finish it. Karel dragoun (talk) 00:38, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good for you. I hope you can satisfy the requirements. Cheers ww2censor (talk) 01:12, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Czech Branch of the House of Thurn und Taxis. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Taken from this website: [1] ww2censor (talk) 16:18, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have emailed permissions-en@wikimedia.org <permissions-en@wikimedia.org> to provide clarification as requested. I hope that this will settle the matter. I am still navigating through the Wikipedia maze of rules, which have indeed toughened, and trying to learn on the go. The article is also a work in progress, so let me finish it. Karel dragoun (talk) 00:36, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the meantime, I have deleted the page as a copyvio. It may be undeleted if you can show evidence that you are indeed the copyright holder. However, as ww2censor has mentioned above, the article dis not cite any sources, so even if the copyright problem is resolved, there may be other problems with the article. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:34, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Vítězslava Kaprálová, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Munch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Julie Reisserová may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

continued her composition studies in [[Bern]] with [[Ernst Hohlfeld]] and with [[Albert Roussel]] {1924-1929) and [[Nadia Boulanger]].<ref>kapralova.org</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:33, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Karel dragoun. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Karel dragoun. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeroným Zajíček (March 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by L293D was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Karel dragoun/Jeroným Zajíček and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Karel dragoun/Jeroným Zajíček, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

L293D (☎ • ✎) 03:00, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Karel dragoun! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! L293D (☎ • ✎) 03:00, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Václav Kaprál, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Václav Kaprál

There is no copyright problem. The original Kapral page has been intentionally removed and the content was transferred to Wikipedia so that it is available somewhere. Just see for yourself: http://www.kapralova.org/KAPRAL.htm

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from here. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:06, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jeroným Zajíček has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jeroným Zajíček. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:10, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jeroným Zajíček has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jeroným Zajíček. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:11, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeroným Zajíček (May 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SkyGazer 512 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Subject is not supported by many secondary sources. It's off to a good start, and it's clear that this composer has made many pieces, but in order to be notable enough to be accepted and moved to the article namespace, the page must have several reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeroným Zajíček and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jeroným Zajíček, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SkyGazer 512 ^{What will you say? / What did I do?} 01:35, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kapralova Society (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources are not independent.

This draft has external links in the article body. They are not permitted.

This draft does not provide information on what independent sources have written about the society.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kapralova Society and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kapralova Society, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:59, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Karel dragoun. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kapralova Society has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kapralova Society. Thanks! JC7V (talk) 18:56, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kapralova Society (December 26)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by K.e.coffman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Does not meet WP:NORG; significant coverage not found. Can be briefly mentioned in the Vítězslava Kaprálová article instead.

K.e.coffman (talk) 07:48, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of sonatas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Rebecca Clarke

Sonata (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Rebecca Clarke

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kapralova Society

Hello, Karel dragoun. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kapralova Society".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 08:23, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kapralova society journal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kapralova society journal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CatcherStorm ^talk 02:16, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kapralova society journal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kapralova society journal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kapralova society journal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CatcherStorm ^talk 03:36, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kapralova Society concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kapralova Society, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kapralova Society

Hello, Karel dragoun. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kapralova Society".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:15, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agnes Tyrrell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Czech (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:34, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kapralova Society Journal

There is nothing to gain by removing a detailed, properly-formatted, reference and replacing it by a bare URL. I have reverted your edits, but then rescued the update from "Advocates" to "Outside resources", and also disagreed with, and removed, the negative comments made on two of the references, with appropriate edit summaries.

You said "Do not remove, replace, or annotate. Keep the references simple and easy to access", but references comprising bare URLs will always be upgraded when a conscientious editor or bot notices them. I am not sure what you were trying to achieve with your unusual edits here. PamD 19:57, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]