User talk:Kareena kareena

September 2014

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Sara Raza Khan. Thank you.--Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 19:04, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Sajal Ali. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SQGibbon (talk) 21:21, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Anushka Sharma may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

and former model. She has been noted for looks very similar to singer [[Nazia Hassan]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Anushka Sharma look alike: Pakistani Nazia Hassan|url=http://www.apunkachoice.com/
//www.apunkachoice.com/content/slide_show/sid2076-slideshow_bollywood_lookalikes/10.html</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Anushka Sharma slide show Pakistani singer Nazia Hassan|url=http://www.pinkvilla.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:57, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Robert Pattinson. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Jockzain (talk) 16:21, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BLP plea

Kareena kareena, you cannot continue to add unsourced content (i.e. personal information) to biography articles. As the notices and links provided to you above make clear, you must include reliable sources when editing. We don't include information regarding a subject's religion unless it is both sourced and relevant to their notability. Readers need to be able to verify that the information you are adding is accurate and this is achieved through the use of reliable sources. If you intend to continue to edit biography articles it is extremely important that you read through the links to the policy pages I've linked in this message.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:11, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for the continued addition of unsourced material to biography articles despite multiple warnings that such edits are against policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:42, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sanam Saeed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amanat Ali. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page.

See also WP:COI in case it might apply. --Ronz (talk) 17:12, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:58, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Humaima Malick, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Geniac (talk) 17:01, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued violations of Wikipedia's BLP-policy through the addition of unsourced and poorly sourced content as well as falsification of references (i.e. the use of inline citations that do not support the material you are adding). In addition, you continue to add promotional material to articles contrary to policy (and if you are receiving payment for such edits, contrary to the Foundation's Terms of Use). If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.