User talk:Karbokation

Welcome!

Hello, Karbokation, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Russell P. Hughes, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 22:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Russell P. Hughes

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Russell P. Hughes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://chemistry.dartmouth.edu/news-events/fluorine-chemistry-symposium/russell-p-hughes. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 22:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The biographical section of this was in my opinion a direct copyvio, and the efforts to rewrite it were trivial--see WP:Close paraphrase. Because of his importance, I rewrote it to a minimal degree. Please do not repeat this: use the facts, but not the sentence structure. I also added the basic links to other articles. DGG ( talk ) 00:40, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David M. Lemal

Hello, Karbokation. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, David M. Lemal, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want David M. Lemal to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Joe Roe (talk) 23:49, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, but be careful

Welcome to Wikipedia. Here are suggested readings: WP:SECONDARY and WP:COI. The gist of these guidelines are:

Wikipedia prefers citations to reviews and books, not primary journal references (tens of thousands appear annually). Citing secondary sources is the encyclopedic style.
Do not cite yourself or your colleagues. It's called conflict of interest. Many new editors cite themselves mainly. That behavior is inappropriate, not to mention tacky. We are here to promote knowledge, not ourselves or our colleagues and friends.
Observing these two guidelines will set a suitable example for your coworkers.

If you have questions, many editors can offer advice. Happy editing.--Smokefoot (talk) 15:52, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]