User talk:KaratJaeger

Welcome!

Hello, KaratJaeger, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 04:02, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Saiph121 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:40, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KaratJaeger (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account is legitimate and not illegal. All of these allegations of Sock puppetry is truly false and has no connection to this "Saiph121". Besides, if my account is being blocked, how am i be able to to address the information given at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Saiph121? KaratJaeger (talk) 16:20, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You say below, "So here's my response to this allegations of sock puppetry being filed at the SPI, it's not really true and all of these allegations are baseless." So I took a look. Colgsher (talk · contribs) was blocked on 2018-03-13. This account was indeed registered shortly after that account was blocked; less than two weeks later. Your first edit was this, which was indeed to Beauty and the Beast (2017 film) and that article has indeed been the repeated target of Saiph's sockpuppetry. This edit, made by this account, did indeed restore an edit from a previous sock. So, despite your claims to the contrary, all of the evidence presented at the SPI are true and I find the block to be legitimate. Yamla (talk) 11:53, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A fair question. You can post our remarks here and request that they be carried over to the SPI if it's still open.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:32, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So here's my response to this allegations of sock puppetry being filed at the SPI, it's not really true and all of these allegations are baseless. All of my edits have been consistently productive and are not causing editing disruption. KaratJaeger (talk) 23:30, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]