User talk:Karachi Lahore

Welcome!

Hello, Karachi Lahore, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JSFarman (talk) 16:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Karachi Lahore. Thank you for your work on Janine Teo. Another editor, Bastun, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work on your new article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paid page

Hello Karachi Lahore. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Karachi Lahore. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Karachi Lahore|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. In2020 (talk) 14:16, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sir, thanks you for your notification! Regarding my recent article on Wikipedia, I am neither paid nor affiliated with subject I created. And it is now that I learned there was an existing article in the drafts which I will be working on it. Thanks! Karachi Lahore (talk) 12:05, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No you are lying. You are hired on upwork https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~0145f0eaa45eac39dc - Admins @DoubleGrazing and Bearcat: should know this.In2020 (talk) 15:14, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You do realize that just because a person has an Upwork profile for freelance work is not ironclad proof that any Wikipedia article they work on was automatically paid work in and of itself, right? Especially since you haven't provided hard evidence to link that Upwork profile to this editor in the first place? Bearcat (talk) 15:18, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No sir @Bearcat:. this is not his profile link. This is the link of job posted to create Janine Teo. In this another job you can see her company name https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~0195bacadd91dcbeb8/ and in other job reviews you can see her name Janine. In the link i posted above you can see Hired:1 2 weeks ago. can i send you screenshot?In2020 (talk) 18:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is almost half a year since I joined Wikipedia. Though I am busy in my external life and do not edit quite frequently, I am very confident at least to know the main Wikipedia guidelines and I know undisclosed payment is against WMF rules, which I strictly abide to. Hopefully, you may be referring the case mistakenly or to some other editors, which I am not sure! I think you have an evidence to show further which may include personally identifying information too, which I suggest you to present it to paid en via email and hopefully, you will learn the truth out there. In the mean time, since I am confident with my cleanliness and since I believe the edits I did are in congruent with Wikipedia's guidelines, I am moving the page to the main-space. But, to maintain the uncertainty with the previous editors, I am leaving the undisclosed paid tag on the page in the main-space too! Karachi Lahore (talk) 13:24, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i do have evidence and link to your profile who is hired by Janine Teo on Upwork. Your username also show the same location (Pakistan) of the hired paid wikipedia freelancer. I will provide further evidence to admin upon their request. You said it half a year since you joined wiki and this account you kept as sleeper. I have moved the article to draft so don’t move back to main space. I will reach out to admins for further investigation on your account.In2020 (talk) 14:32, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]