User talk:KarMarBar12

= So now you think it's me?no way hahahaha

Proposed deletion of Daniela Cordero

The article Daniela Cordero has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. JarrahTree 00:06, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User talk:Philip J Fry, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. JustBerry (talk) 02:57, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

- I DIDNT VANDALIZE. POLO DIDNT CONFIRM HIS HOMOSEXUALITY. HE JUST SAID THAT HE IS PROUD TO BE WHO HE IS.
  What is your sourcing for that? --JustBerry (talk) 03:14, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- He said " Im proud to be who i am" it is in the media he didnt say " I AM GAY"

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Polo Morín. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:03, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

**you can see his fb live

==

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KarMarBar12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I DIDNT DO ANYTHING WRONG KarMarBar12 (talk) 03:07, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural, duplicate request below. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:50, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

==

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KarMarBar12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didnt do anything wrongKarMarBar12 (talk) 03:07, 8 January 2017 (UTC) KarMarBar12 (talk) 03:07, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You received multiple warnings, visible above, which clearly detail exactly what you did wrong. Your request shows that you do not or do not wish to understand this, which is only an argument for leaving the block in place. If you continue to edit in the same way after the expiration of this block you will almost certainly be blocked for a much longer period, possibly indefinitely. If you do understand the warnings above please take the time to articulate this understanding and a willingness not to repeat the edits which got you blocked, and if you decide to make another unblock request I highly suggest reading the guide to appealing blocks before doing so. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:50, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KarMarBar12, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Philip J Fry Talk ^{Tag me!} 05:40, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as how you've both used an IP address and MorinTeamOficial (talk · contribs) to continue your edit war after being blocked, I've extended your current block to three days. I think this is fairly lenient considering how much disruption you've caused in the article. Once your block expires, I hope that you'll use the article's talk page to discuss the matter. I understand that you desperately want to change this information, but there are ways to do it without being disruptive. If you truly do represent Molin officially, I would suggest you e-mail a volunteer at Wikipedia through official channels instead of edit warring. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:19, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KarMarBar12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

Decline reason:

Once again a duplicate request. Huon (talk) 21:53, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

First I did change the information because Polo Morin didnt said "Soy Homosexual" however he said "Estoy orgulloso de ser quien soy" so does that mean he is homosexual? thats why these dudes blocked me.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KarMarBar12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I edited the false info with real info and they keeped reverted it so i did the same Polo Morin never said he is gay he said "estoy orgulloso de ser quien soyy"

Decline reason:

If Polo Morin had said that without context, you might well have a point. When multiple reliable sources take it as confirmation of homosexuality because he said that (and more) in the context of leaked personal photos showing him "in an affectionate attitude towards another person of the same sex" (roughly translated from here), not so much. Huon (talk) 21:53, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So now people will create accounts and you guys are going to say itsme? no pos wow.

If those "people" happen to parrot your talking points the moment you're blocked, yes. Huon (talk) 21:53, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KarMarBar12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here KarMarBar12 (talk) 21:59, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are clearly just wasting our time now. Talk page access revoked for the duration of the block. The block should almost certainly be extended, but meh. Yamla (talk) 22:21, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Im in a whatsapp group and i send them here and told them what i said. It is not my facultad that the y post the dame shot when thats how i told them i atore it. And yes, polo said "Estoy orgulloso de ser quien soy" he never said anything more well at léast thats what i saw.

It absolutely is your fault. See WP:MEAT. --Yamla (talk) 22:21, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, I'm Philip J Fry. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Polo Morín, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Philip J Fry • (talk) 23:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As I keep waiting for you to add references to the article, you will not expect me to do everything for you?.--Philip J Fry • (talk) 23:49, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have already solved the errors you found. And I ask you to stop using capital letters and write well, that as well as fill my page of conversation of badly written messages in the same way you do in the articles.--Philip J Fry • (talk) 23:54, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add information without sources in El Bienamado, and use the correct format for the cast according to the style manual.--Philip J Fry • (talk) 23:56, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Editing

Hello KarMarBar12, I am aware that you were initially blocked by User:Oshwah for edit warring on Polo Morín. Afterwards, User:NinjaRobotPirate and User:Yamla were involved in extending your block for sockpuppeteering, let alone blocking your sock User:MorinTeamOficial and your continual editing (while logged out) via the IP address 46.242.13.244. After your recent unblock, you seem to have resorted to adding unsourced content, as reverted by User:Philip J Fry here. Twitter is not a reliable source in this case because a potentially joke comment by the user could be misinterpretted as a fact, and information should not be cited within edit summaries (as you did here). If you need help, you should feel free to reach out and seek guidance for how to do so, whether that be at the reliable source noticeboard, WP:Teahouse, or the talk page of any other experienced editor, administrator, etc. However, messages, such as these, are seen as provocative, rather than conducive to collaboration and learning Wikipedia's guidelines. Please remember that competence is required to edit on Wikipedia.

However, that being said, I don't easily give up on lending a hand to other users, and I'm willing to help you learn to identify reliable sources, cite those sources, and edit articles accordingly as long as you edit with civility and don't create and edit from other accounts. If you would like to make a change to the Polo Morin article, for example, you can create a discussion on the article talk page, after which other editors and myself can chime in to provide suggestions/alterations/questions/etc. to discuss the change. Although you don't necessarily need permission to edit an article, this process can guide you to make more constructive contributions. Please take my suggestions and proposal as constructive criticism, not personally. What do you think? --JustBerry (talk) 00:31, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia needs more people like you :) and I honestly thank you. about the twitter info i got it from the official page of la novela — Preceding unsigned comment added by KarMarBar12 (talk • contribs) 00:55, 15 January 2017 (UTC) ^{(copied by JustBerry (talk) from xis talk page to this talk page)}[reply]

@KarMarBar12: I appreciate that you seem to be calm now. Just remember, there's no rush. Wikipedia isn't running away. We can calmly look at edits together. My hope is that you will experience less frustration conflicts (or potential edit wars) with other users, while gaining some experience and knowledge in the context of Wikipedia's guidelines. If I may ask, what is the link to the official page you're referring to? Also, are you referring to this edit? Also, feel free to get my attention by using the ping template. I have used the ping template before this message to give you an example of how the template is used. --JustBerry (talk) 01:08, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As a note: AnaliaLopez wasn't blocked. Under the proper conditions, Twitter and Facebook could be usable, but only for certain things – usually uncontroversial facts, such as age, made by the subject of a biography made under his or her official account. You have to be very careful when using these sources because we don't want to spread rumors or hoaxes. It's often best to stick to trusted news sites. Discussion on the talk page can help a lot when trying to decide whether to include content or what source to use. Nobody has to use the talk page to get permission to edit an article, but discussing potential changes there can lead to a smoother experience. If I want to make a big change to an article, sometimes I post a message to an article's talk page and wait a few days before I make the change. It's frustrating to wait that long, but I want to give people a chance to offer their input. Sometimes they come up with a better idea. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:14, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: Thanks, I have clarified my message accordingly. --JustBerry (talk) 01:21, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@JustBerry: Message text. No, I changed a few things for example the movie "sobre tus huellas" is set to premiere this year, before e bienamado he filmed "Escuela para seductores" etc — Preceding unsigned comment added by karmarbar12 (talk • contribs)

@KarMarBar12: Hm, I am not sure which edit you are referring to. Let's start with this: which source are you looking at? --JustBerry (talk) 01:50, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I leave this link so you can learn a bit about adding references.--Philip J Fry • (talk) 02:01, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may also want to look at WP:REFBEGIN. Feel free to leave any questions you may have below! --JustBerry (talk) 03:44, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@JustBerry: can you revert what I did? I mean it is his character in the Escuela Para Seductores movie but I failed adding it great — Preceding unsigned comment added by KarMarBar12 (talk • contribs)

I'm not quite sure what you are referring to. Perhaps User:Philip J Fry may know, since he appears to have reached out to you initially. I was simply adding on another resource you may find helpful. --JustBerry (talk) 21:53, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]