Jump to content

User talk:Kappa/5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an archived talk page belonging to User:Kappa. Previous discussions: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4

Vandalism of Turkish Music Pages

[edit]

Some persons are trying to falsely promote Arabic culture by vandalising Turkish music pages, of artists such as Tarkan, Sezen Aksu, Sertab and Mustafa Sandal by trying to create a whole new category of music in Turkish when no musicologist or encyclopedia verifies this - namely the "category" Arabesque-pop music. Please check the history - I have tried to fix it but the culprit still keeps reverting. He also tries to place Turksh pop performers as part of this fake genre. Arabesque music with pop influence is called Arabsque-fantazi (Fantasy) and none of the pop musicians named above are categorised in the fanatsy genre of Arabesque music. 82.145.231.188 14:27, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userbar

[edit]

Hey Kappa, I was wondering why you keep changing Userbar to redirect to toolbar. They have nothing in common.

Yeah, me too W3bbo 18
35, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

The Hacker Test

[edit]

What do you think of the Hacker Test? Timothy Clemans 08:01, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mani Damodara Chakyar

[edit]

HI kappa, Thanks for your help regarding the foto and article on Mani Damodara Chakyar. I had taken that foto and i am ready to allow for public usage of that foto. i dont know about websites but you can check the book - Manimadhaveeyam- (biography of Mani Madhava Chakyar)published by Dept. of Cultural Publications, Govt. of Kerala, regarding him. I will submit more informations regarding that great artist soon. I saw so many things are not in a good form in Kudiyattam sites so i wanted to update that thru wikipedia(i am myself is a kudiyattam artist and received scholarship for more than 10 years from Sangeet Natak Academy( Govt. of India ).Please advise me in helping the foto to be viewed by everyone. Thanking you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sreekanthv (talk • contribs)

hi kappa, i need your help once again. why google isnt poviding the article about Mani Damodara Chakyar ? And i would like to know why there is delay in detecting the Photos (that i have contributed in pages like Koodiyattam, Mani Madhava Chakyar, Mani Damodara Chakyar, Chakyar koothu etc.) by Google ? Sreekanthv 18:17, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fippy Darkpaw

[edit]

Re. your comments in the above discussion. Personally I believe that the bloat caused by articles like the above is a much bigger threat in the long term to the health and survival of Wikipedia than the deletion would be. As for the storage cost, yes it's negligable for one article, but in the end it will add up if you take the sum of all useless articles. Hirudo 01:58, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, as a more general remark. Your comment "If people aren't using it, it has nothing but a neglible cost of storage. If people are using it, they are getting more value from wikipedia and are more likely contribute their own time, money and real information" seems to indicate to me that you disagree with having notability guidelines at all. After all, if someone adds an article about his garage band, it's always possible that his neighbour is going to come look for it, right? Or do you just think the guidelines need to be relaxed ? Hirudo 02:02, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • The appropriate guideline is whether or not there is a significant audience for the information, whether it's a game character, a band, a TV show or anything else. If people are coming to wikipedia and looking for information which we have destroyed, we aren't keeping our promise to them. Kappa 07:48, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • While I won't dispute that there's a significant audience for information about EverQuest, I definitely dispute that this exists for every bit of trivia about it. Hirudo 16:36, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mani Damodara Chakyar

[edit]

Sreekanthv

Bat-embargo

[edit]

Hi I noticed you seem open minded about keeping good information and interested in the Bat Embargo. Please help me keep and improve the bat-embargo page.--T for Trouble-maker 22:19, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Piranha

[edit]

Waaaaay too short. Said absolutely zilch about the film. It was not much more than a placeholder for the IMDb link. Kind of a judgement call, I'm afraid. Still a bit thin in the skin, but it looks better now. - Lucky 6.9 00:10, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clothing bin

[edit]

Why the preference for the stub now that's been transwikied? A stub is supposed to be used for articles that have realistic potential to be expanded. Do you really think clothing bin will be expanded beyond a dictdef? I'm also not sure it qualifies as a tool stub. It's a container. I wouldn't call a box a tool. -- JLaTondre 19:24, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • It's not obvious to me that wiktionary will accept an entry on "clothing bin" because it isn't an idiom, it's simply "clothing" + "bin". Also any wiktionary entry would not discuss the dimensions and construction of a clothing bin, or how they are vandalized, or the fact that homeless people sometimes sleep in them. If you feel there is a more suitable stub category than tool-stub, please restub it. Also please don't use {{wi}} tags when there isn't actually a wiktionary in existence. Kappa 19:42, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hmm they do have an entry, how did I miss it. Anyway it doesn't and can't have any enclopedic discussion of clothing bins, and it still seems like a deletion candidate because it isn't an idiom. Kappa 19:50, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • You've lost me. Is your last comment about wikitionary or wikipedia? Because if wikipedia, then you're agreeing with me, but I don't think that's the case... -- JLaTondre 20:01, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        • It's a deletion candidate at wiktionary because it's meaning isn't different from the sum of it's parts, clothing + bin. Kappa 20:02, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
          • I see that you have expanded the article which made your previous comment more understandable (to me). You've answered my curiosity. As for the stub, I don't see a better one. I don't think tool is correct, but it's definitely the least incorrect from my perusal of the stubs list. -- JLaTondre 20:13, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New Age Festival

[edit]

[1] The article as it is now is mere promotional material for User:Metaholist business. Metaholist is very agile promoter and spammed quite a few generic pages with his product. Pavel Vozenilek 00:55, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I concede in this. Pavel Vozenilek 02:46, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree with Kappathat that New Age Festivals are notable, and if appropriate, would invite other new age festival organizers to also include their links to make it a more balanced category (I am fairly new to Wikkipedia, and do appreciate any pointers - let me know if this is appropriate. I do have a personal interest in seeing this category gaining acceptance, and have provided some links such as categories associated and cities that host the festivals included in Wikipedia. Any pointer are appreciated Metaholist 09:45, 26 January 2006.
  • In Response to your message "Other New Age Festivals" Done, I just contacted two of my collegues that hosts a great non-profit event in the U.S. and the other in the U.K. I've also invited an organization that reports to it's members on the ethics and professional standards of such events to it's members - which should provide more balance, as well as allow for outside validation of the notibitity of the events added. --Metaholist 17:31, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dates in baseball

[edit]

Thanks for your support. It could be a bad precedent for future projects. Cheers – MusiCitizen 21:19, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Halton Youth Symphony

[edit]

I wrote the article due to informational purposes only- I'm an actual member of the symphony, and I know for a fact that the website does not have any sort of copyright whatsoever. I have asked our manager myself, and the site's information is free for use. The information copied from there is completely legal, as you will be able to see when you visit the website. Please activate the page again- many of us (members) really want a Wikipedia page for our symphony. Ihatevandals 02:55, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Well, I can't see anything on the site which says it has no copyright. According to Wikipedia:Copyright_problems the best thing is for the your manager to "Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions at wikimedia dot org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation." In the meantime you can put this message on the discussion page of the article and under the HYS' listing at Wikipedia:Copyright_problems. If you want to edit the page to a previous version I won't revert it but I don't know what anyone else will do. Remember even if it gets deleted you can still write a whole new version from scratch in your own words. Kappa 09:13, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rfa?

[edit]

I see many want you as an admin, so can I vote you, my Wikimentor, for Rfa? Tdxiang 陈 鼎 翔 (Talk) Chat with Tdxiang on IRC! My Rfa

Stressed? In that case you are doing a good job in hodng it. Compare that to the kind of things I do when I get angry and need to vent: Block Tony Sidaway, run around on AFD to find something to vote "delete" on, snarl off test4-templates to anonymous users... Ah well, keep up the good work, in particular I've been impressed with your work on AFC. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:59, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Templemore Sports Complex

[edit]

It's a municipal sports complex. Would you like me to add all the public swimming pools I can name to Wikipedia? Anyway, the article had nothing to merge -- I can think of only one sentence that merited a merge (which was unverifiable; a Google turned up nothing to back up the assertion that the "compy" has an Olympic-class swimming pool), and I've already expanded the complex's entry in Derry with verifiable information. Johnleemk | Talk 16:24, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • " Would you like me to add all the public swimming pools I can name to Wikipedia?" If they have various notable athletes training at them, and international events are hosted there, yes. Are you equating "can be googled" with "verifiable"? Since you've deleted the article, no-one else will have a chance to find other ways to check out the claims. Kappa 16:39, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • The article said noting about notable athletes training there nor the hosting of international events. The notable events it mentioned like the Woodbrook Championships turn up absolutely nothing on Google. Here is the article as it stood after SeanMack "removed rubbish" (as he said in his edit summary):
The Templemore Sports Complex (affectionately known as the 'compy') is situated ten minutes from the Derry/Donegal border. Founded in 1972, it offers affordable and/or cheap sporting resources for the local people of Derry in particular the people of the Glengalliagh/Shantallow area. Such resources include an olympic-sized Swimming pool, a fully-serviced gym and several indoor tennis courts.
The complex has hosted many championships and events over the years such as the Milk cup and the Woodbrook championships.
If you really think this indicates notability, bring it up on DRV. Even the official Derry websites I've visited (who would have the most to gain from exaggerating any notability) mention nothing about prominent athletes training there, nor any prominent sporting events (besides a boxing tournament which we don't have an article about). Johnleemk | Talk 16:57, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Content, or lack thereof

[edit]

Those Korean movie stubs really had no content. As I told RxStrangelove, they consisted of nothing more than "So-and-so is a 19xx South Korean film." I don't wish to cause hard feelings, as you know. I'll be concentrating more on real vandalism and taking your suggestions regarding good faith edits to heart. I really do appreciate your feedback. - Lucky 6.9 23:03, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Truth About Killer Dinosaurs

[edit]

Hey, when did the BBC air this program? I want to track down a copy or a download of it. Thanks. --Madchester 18:38, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • August/September 2005 according to this: [2] . 19:38, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Copyvios

[edit]

All the time that I was following him around putting {{wikify}} etc. on the articles, I had a nagging suspicion that their uniformity meant copyvio; I'm afraid it was probably just laziness that stopped me investigating further. It's a good job you were watching. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 09:58, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

[edit]

You just beat me to adding the stub template to Paragliding. I'm still finding out how to do things the right way around here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Politas (talk • contribs)

Thanks

[edit]

Hi, This page contains material from Calcutta article of Wikipedia. The website you have sited for copyright infringement actually borrows the content from Wikipedia itself. So there is no copyright infringements I think. Dwaipayanc--Dwaipayanc 07:49, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

  • OK I'll trust you on that. Remember when you extract material from wikipedia pages you are supposed to mention where it came from in the edit summary. Kappa 10:16, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing Atomic Dog

[edit]

Hi! You reverted my edit of Atomic Dog, with a nice message clarifying Wikipedia policy. I just wanted to say thanks for that, and let you know that I will refrain from such activities in the future. (This message is not sarcastic.) Rainwarrior 19:08, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibat

[edit]

Hi, I've updated this AfD with some info, and am notifying everyone who has participated in the discussion so far. I'm doing this because I think some users have misunderstood what Ibat is. Please read my comments at the AfD, and if you wish, update your comments. Thanks! Mindmatrix 00:32, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User page in a category

[edit]

Hi. FYI, your user page, User:Kappa/Willard (band) is appearing in a category so you might want to remove it. Thanks! —Wknight94 (talk) 15:15, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uncategorized good articles

[edit]

Don't forget to remove fixed articles when working on User:Bluemoose/Uncategorised_good_articles, Thanks for helping! -Ravedave 04:55, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Listcruft

[edit]

Hi there,

Thanks for taking the time to contribute to the Wikipedia:Listcruft page. I understand that you have concerns about it being (mis)interpreted as an official policy, or otherwise, so I have added a disclaimer of same underneath the title.

I also removed the {{disputed}} tag from the article, for rationale, please see Wikipedia talk:Listcruft. Stifle 23:13, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Re: the Recent StarCraft Pages

[edit]

User:Yunzhong Hou--High Templar--Template:StarCraft Game--High Archon (StarCraft)--StarCraft Units--StarCraft Structures--Gateway (StarCraft)--Shield Battery (StarCraft)--Forge (StarCraft)--Templar Archives (StarCraft)

Hello Kappa,

I recently received notice from you on not making StarCraft into a game guide. Does that mean I should quit my project and roam elsewhere on WP for something to do? So far the few people who looked at my article have said that it's good, and now I'm getting nervous. I have done way too much to get all of my articles, my template and even a buddy's StarCraft images deleted, and yet I still think that there is much more for me to do- too much for me to quit now. Am I going in the wrong direction? If I am, I am willing to modify the articles to reflect the wishes of the WP community.

I hope to get a reply soon...

--Yunzhong Hou 14:34, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • I can see you are making good articles, and I would hate to see them deleted. The fact that they are well-written makes them less likely to be nominated, although some of them do contain statements that look more like advice than explanations. Note that separate items often end up merged into lists (e.g. Minor Slytherins), it might be wise to do this pre-emptively. Also if you do want to make a game guide, you might want to look at wikicities or somewhere - wikibooks used to do games, but I heard that Jimbo doesn't approve. Kappa 14:58, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Images debated

[edit]

Hi, Kappa. I've noticed you like to contribute to discussions on deletions. Unfortunately, a lot of the photos put up for deletion don't seem to get noticed much. A couple of images I uploaded were nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2006 January 31 (Adele Stevens.jpg and Lexie Karlsen.jpg). I would appreciate your input. Thank you. --Alsayid 21:14, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for adding wi tag

[edit]

Hi Kappa; thanks for adding the wi tag to Indignation. I didn't know about that template. --Allen 23:45, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Saruman

[edit]

Saruman was not a man but a wizard, a member of the Istari, who came from the Uttermost West, to save Middle-earth from Sauron.--File Éireann 00:34, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Keep it up

[edit]

I just wanted to thank you for keeping an eye on WP:PROD, keep up the good work. Christopher Parham (talk) 19:50, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk: Description

[edit]

Thanks for the taking the time to attempt to explain why the policies and guidelines here are widely ignored. I'm afraid I do not agree with your assessment concerning consistency, policies and guidelines; however, I do appreciate the civil tone that you kept the conversation. In my business policies and guidelines are vital. Lack of consistency in following them could have devastating effects eventually. My obervations in life are that this model tends to hold true in most, if not all, things. I'm certainly not disputing the need for judgement calls. They are useful while you are devising policies and guidelines.

Unfortuantely, a definition is a definition. Your judgement, my judgement, and Fred Flintstone's judgement isn't going to change what a definition is. Somebody at one time made the decision that Wikipedia was not going to be a dictionary; however, lack of consistency in enforcing this has caused a lot of definitions to find a home in Wikipedia.

Anyway, I am ranting more than I really wanted to here. I really just wanted to thank you for your civility and your explanations. I'm afraid I you and I are going to have to agree to disagree.

BTW, I have to remain consistent with my own actions; therefore, I plan on nominating the article for AfD. I know it seems ridiculous since you and I both know what the outcome is. But as I said, consistency is better than better.

James084 02:26, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MECE principle

[edit]

Thanks for cleanup up MECE principle. You turned a piece of junk into a well-written and informative article. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:28, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

prod on Michel Saloff Coste article removed

[edit]

Hello, Kappa! just thought I'd ask... regarding that {{prod}} tag; wouldn't one become, uhm, just a wee bit suspicious :) about a Monsieur who says he is a business school professor but doesn't appear on the staff list, who says he is an author of five books, all in French... after the French fellas have had the article about him deleted? Bref, les livres publiés doivent, de préférence être publiés chez de grands éditeurs. Pour les scientifiques et les théoriciens, les livres doivent réellement faire référence.

Aint know nothin' about this futurist celebrity, frankly :) But you got me curious again, after my little past involvement times ago. So... what's your say? Thanks, and cheers! - Introvert ~? 02:58, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio tags

[edit]

Hi. I notice you've tagged a lot of the pages created by user:Apcbg with copyvio tags. Just to let you know that the copyvio problem with pages by that user has been resolved - see various article talk pages, and his user page, where permission has been given. I am in the process of copyediting the pages into a consistent wiki form, but given the quantity its going to take a while. Is there an easy way to get the tags removed from all of the relevent articles? Otherwise there is a risk that some will be deleted before I get to them (also that would save burdening the copyvio list with these articles which is likely to lead to duplication as people investigate some of them). Kcordina 12:14, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • OK, I'm removed the tag from all the articles I placed it on (I hope). I think the author has claimed permission on all of the talk pages, so they should not be automatically deleted anyone going through the copyvio list. Unfortunately I'm not a bot expert so I can't tell you if there's a simple way to find out if any of his contributions are still tagged with copyvio. Kappa 12:34, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Circadian rhythm

[edit]

I was just comparing my daily and weekly edit patterns to yours - do you ever sleep? BD2412 T 21:59, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whiting Lane Elementary School

[edit]

Unless you beat me to it, I will be recreating a more encyclopedic version of the Whiting Lane Elementary School article over the weekend. While on the subject of out of process deletions, you may want to review Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Brian_Peppers. Silensor 00:22, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yeah technically we should be providing wp readers with NPOV info on that poor guy, but I just don't have the heart to vote to undelete. Kappa 00:35, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • The article for Whiting Lane School has been created, with Whiting Lane Elementary School redirecting there. As for Peppers, I found this comment by Adrian particular moving (below) Silensor 08:23, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      I'm not sure how I could argue otherwise. He's quite evidently an involuntary, limited-purpose, deeply-unfortunate public figure, based on extensive rehashing of his case in the public eye. Or did you mean that only the media can create public figures? That'd be a bit elitist of us as journalists, no? As for laughing at Mr. Peppers, I think you do a disservice to Wikipedia. I think it can handle this topic without cruelty or malice, and paint Peppers for what he is -- an unfortunate man, who's made mistakes, and still has a life ahead of him. I firmly believe deleting his entry is unethical. It deprives him of the one online resource that might keep track of any positive achievements of his, and says, basically, that we're going to sweep him under the rug, that we see him as so deeply pathetic that he's unsuitable for coverage. That isn't reasonable *or* ethical. Adrian Lamo ·· 02:34, 11 February 2006 [4]


Korean Baseball

[edit]

Hi Kappa, I've created a Kia Tigers page and merged, redirected the Haitai Tigers page there, seems more sensible than the other way around as Haitai, for all their history, are now defunct. ++Deiz 03:23, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Longest streets in London

[edit]

In what way exactly is calling that OR "pushing it"? It's hardly pushing it at all, it's undisputably OR. For one, demonstrate a way in which this information might be obtained and verified. 06:18, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

  • I don't regard performing a measurement on a map to be OR - anyone can verify it by performing the same action. Thus the wiki process can function and we end up with a reliable article. Kappa 13:20, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Please explain how performing a distance measurement on a map can possibly not be OR. 01:56, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Ananta Das Gaswami

[edit]

I tagged this for a prod as 'unverifiable', [5]. You removed the tag with the summary 'remove prod tag, cats, stubs'. If you were able to verify this, then fair enough - but could you place some verification in the article. If not, why did you deprod it? --Doc ask? 10:57, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Done so. I wouldn't have proded it had I been able to verify it, and I'll be quite happy if someone manages to verify it. --Doc ask? 13:29, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Angtoria

[edit]

Kappa, you do realise this if someone send it to AfD, it will 99.97% chance be deleted as failing WP:MUSIC. Is there some back-story that I'm missing? - brenneman{T}{L} 14:27, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NG

[edit]

Hi. I have no problem with your edit, per se, but that box was copied from WP:VSCA, which you may wish to look at as well. Further "everyone should know about" is a bit of tongue-in-cheek frustration at the proliferation of garbage in Wikipedia. Thanks. -- Avi 19:06, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kappa, WP:NG is NOT an article, it is an essay. As such the {{disputed}} tag is not applicable. Please follow this link [10]. Notice what it says on top: Essays about Wikipedia and related topics. These are not policy and are primarily opinion pieces . So, of course you can dispute it, but the dispute tag is neither applicable, nor called for. By all means, write a counter-essay, but please stop vandalizing WP:NG. Thank you, -- Avi 00:22, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • We all have a responsibity to ensure that essays are not misleading and do not misprepresent opinions as facts. You seems to want to brush the issue of access under the carpet, readers should know that this is a totally disputed issue. Kappa 00:28, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You went through this same procedure with Wikipedia:Listcruft, I see. Please explain to me why my opinion needs your disclaimer? Feel free to write a counter-essay. This is not an article. -- Avi 00:30, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding WP:NG, Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. -- Avi 00:31, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User page

[edit]

User page redirecting to talk page? That's hardcore. Savidan 05:52, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Primitive skills

[edit]

I find your reference to "winning revert wars" unpleaantly and needlessly aggressive (not to mention veering towards being against policy). This incident pretty well confirms my view of the new procedure; one person who wants to keep everything regardless of its merit can veto the suggestion for deletion, without giving any reason. I'll be making a habit of taking such articles to AfD from now on. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 09:23, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • If you would be so kind as to assume good faith, I don't want to keep everything regardless of its merit, however I don't want potentially valuable content to be deleted without proper scrutiny. Note that this so-called "protologism" gets 57,700 google hits and it looks to me to have a well-defined meaning. Kappa 12:21, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The number of Google hits is irrelevant, as it fails to distinguish between a genuine term and a common conjunction of words ("Bach death", the first random choice that I tried, gets 12,400 hits, "book chair" gets 10,900, and "refined skills" gets 21,800; none of them is a genuine subject for an article). Assumption of good faith isn't an issue when someone reverts me and threatens an edit war (by telling me that I can't win one). --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:19, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Well I'm not going bother googling those terms but I'll take your word for it that they don't have a well-defined meaning, unlike primitive skills. You embarked on a revert war when you replaced a disputed prod tag - if you want to delete a disputed article, either try to persuade the disputer that the article should be deleted, or go get a community decision at AFD. Kappa 00:48, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I made one edit; by no stretch of the imagination can that be called "starting a revert war". But I see that there's no point in this discussion. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 10:26, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

B.G.K.

[edit]

Kappa, why did you remove the speedy tag from B.G.K.? LordViD 20:04, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sliced oranges

[edit]

Can you help list this up?Tan DX 05:49, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

22 most-wanted terrorists

[edit]

Thanks for your work in cleaning up this article. The original contributor also created 22 most wanted al Qaeda men. I thought of changing the latter into a redirect page but it seems possible that the most wanted terrorists may not always be al Qaeda. Also, for that matter, there may not always be "22" names on the list. I'm thinking both articles should be redirected to a new article most wanted terrorists and list it on the most wanted disambig. page. Would you agree with this approach? Regards, Accurizer 12:14, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blumpkin

[edit]

The article "Blumpkin" has been listed on Articles for Deletion on the grounds that is a neologism already found in Wiktionary. You are being notified as a contributor to "Blumpkin." BrianGCrawfordMA 20:35, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Beur article

[edit]

You made the Beur article (which was a stub) into a redirect. I was wondering if you had any problem with my writing up something on it, mostly translating from the French [12] and German [13] articles on the word. Smmurphy(Talk) 01:17, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Snootchie bootchies

[edit]

"So next time someone types in "Snootchie bootchies" we should invite them to create a new article for us?" Kappa 02:04, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


First Family of the United States

[edit]

Hey, someone redirected the entire First Family of the United States article into First Family. I just wanted to let you know, seeing as more people voted to keep it than to redirect. I'm reposting it. History21 16:52, 20 February 2006 (UTC)History21[reply]

List questions

[edit]

Just out of curiosity, no hard feelings or anything, but why, in your opinion, do you feel it is neccessary to have a list and a category, when the list provides just a smidgen more information than a category. I don't know, maybe I haven't thought it out very thouroughly, but unless an article can provide some information of significance, I don't feel a list is very useless. I like the List of Presidents of the United States, so I'm not anti-lists, just these minute lists that have potential to be massive and have no extra content besides occupation and birth/death years. Perhaps my criteria is very ambiguous. Just curious on your thoughts. Pepsidrinka 17:20, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Please do not troll me

[edit]

Then I suggest you relax and learn to deal with people. You have chosen to "live" in a very large community. If it makes you feel any better, I don't set out to "poke you with that needle". The problem is that you and I are polar opposites in our opinions. So the poking comes from both of us working to the same common objective on different routes.

Unfortnately, I can't promise that I won't get under you skin anymore than you can promise you won't get under mine.

Why don't we just agree to disagree? Unless you can think of some way we, as polar opposites, can work together. I can think of none. James084 19:39, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Userfication

[edit]

Hey Kappa, I'm pitching userfication guidelines (amazed that we had none) - care to comment on 'em? Cheers! BD2412 T 23:26, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Ewa Sonnet

[edit]

Noticed that you "de-prod"-ed Ewa Sonnet and mentioned, in your edit summary, that she has more than one million Google hits. Perhaps it would interest you to know that using the search term "Ewa Sonnet" (with quotes), I only pulled up 770,000? However, after reaching the 510-ish mark, Google spat back that it omitted many of the search results due to the fact that they were duplicates. Additionally, a bulk of the sites (from what I can gather anyway) are merely sites that bump up the search engine results for Ewa Sonnet with no actual content. Just FYI. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 02:58, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Snowballs

[edit]

Regarding snowballs in hell where people delete things which would have a good chance of surviving, maybe people are thinking about the Norse hell Niflheim. Snowballs seem to stand a pretty good chance there. Also, there is a real Hell in Norway, and now, in wintertime, I think snowballs stand a fair chance there. Sjakkalle (Check!) 14:40, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage in 3rd person?

[edit]

Hi, I wanna ask you if it's possible to write my Wikipedian user page in third person. I thing it sounds more natural like that. What do you think? LuckyAfterAll 10:50, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Veitz

[edit]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Veitz amended accordingly. Tim | meep in my general direction 18:04, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

increase vertical leap how-to

[edit]

Thanks, I was not aware that there was a template for that.—WAvegetarian•CONTRIBUTIONSTALK• EMAIL• 21:30, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at this page

[edit]

If you are a supporter of Don Bosco, take a look at this page.

Brighton Road

[edit]

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Brighton Road. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.15.28.195 (talk • contribs) Sjakkalle (Check!) 15:30, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Al Bhed Page

[edit]

Uh.. You took an unilateral decision to revert an edit that took a lot of consensus to get. Can you restore the merge and detail your concerns on the Articles to be Expanded at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Final Fantasy/To do ? Txs! Renmiri 22:12, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Well I didn't notice any merge tags, and it wasn't properly merged. The material on the Al Bhed language is of interest not only to game fans but also a general readership. Kappa 23:04, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well the merge proposal has been on the project page for debate for two months at least, so why do you claim it was improperly merged ? And as for the Al Bhed language, it is just a plain Substitution cipher and you can read all about those in the proper page. There is even a mention to Al Bhed there. Also, the details of the merged pages were not lost, but moved to Wikicities. Can you please clarify your claim of improper merging in the right place for it, the Project page ? Renmiri 23:52, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there, we are about to move ahead and merge it again discussion. You are correct, the subject deserves much more than the current List of constructed languages provides. Which makes it seem to me that the problem is that page, i.e., constructed languages, including but not limited to Al Bhed, are getting the shaft by being on a page that is merely a list of languages. How about both you fix the problem at the source, i.e, at the place to talk about constructed languages ? Renmiri 23:45, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The source of the problem is editors who want to squish Final Fantasy articles into a big junkyard like Races of Final Fantasy in order to hide them from random page users. Normally I wouldn't care so much because only FF fans lose out from the process. Kappa 23:49, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I don't quite see the logic in that argument: by compiling info into a more reader friendly format (which is to say, putting it together) instead of spreading it out across dozens of pages, that's hiding it?

Also, for that matter, Wikipedia's not an FF fansite. It doesn't make sense to spread that stuff out, either for that reason or for the purpose of making it friendly to the uninitiated.

Anyway, if you actually want to debate the matter with us further, please come to the talk page. I know my last reply in there was a bit harsh, but I was a bit upset at the time. Sorry if it was unwarranted. Ryu Kaze 01:52, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alphabetical order? Check.
Relevant information presented on each race in an easy to follow format? Check.
No one race getting half of the page? Check.
I'd say it's pretty good. By the way, throwing out some ellipses while just assuming that your opinions are superior and not responding to any of the points that have been sent your way doesn't magically render them unfounded. You've been given the courtesy of your points actually being addressed (like that "People who have never heard of FF and want to read about constructed languages are more likely to discover the Al Bhed language on the Al Bhed page than a page about constructed languages" thing). Why can't you extend that to us? Ryu Kaze 02:24, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Look, as it is now, the FFX category already has 12 pages, only FFVII has a similar high number of pages. I love FFX too but Wikipedia is just an Encyclopedia, not a testimony of our love for it. If you want to get into that level of detail, why don't you join my efforts at Wikibooks to do a "Hitchihikers guide to Spira" or Ryu and others efforts at Wikicities then ? I even set up a template titled Template:FFX_resc there, for pages rescued from deletion at Wikipedia. Renmiri 15:51, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
PS: By the way, I saw you help rescue the List of Wikis from deletion here at Wikipedia. Thanks for that! <grin>

Al Jazeera Academy

[edit]

An article you started, Al Jazeera Academy, has been proposed for deletion. You know the drill. NickelShoe 17:03, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA

[edit]

I'm sure you've heard enough about it, but sorry, I was wondering: when? Surely now is the time, when it's userboxes rather than inclusionism/deletionism that gets people foaming at the mouth, sinking otherwise good RfAs... :) CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 06:51, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing prod

[edit]

I noticed you removed the prod tag from the article Gavin Booth but I don't see how this article meets the criteria for a bio. This article is written by his company's publicist. Can you explain to me what's notable about it? Nimby 12:24, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Chad

[edit]

You may be interested in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Chad. KI 18:45, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hunter Ellis

[edit]

I've put this article up for deletion review, after re-writing a stub focused much more on his non-Survivor notability as a TV host, which was then speedy deleted as a recreation of deleted content. Since you commented on the initial AFD, I thought you might want to participate in the discussion here as well. -Colin Kimbrell 17:25, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

de-prod Samurai Jack References

[edit]

Hi Kappa, just wondering what this means: 

{{prod|cartoon cruft}}

You've added it to References in Samurai Jack. Jack 20:22, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, I obviously got the (diff) mixed up. I didn't even realise anyone wanted it deleted, thanks for removing it! Jack 00:32, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John MacBain

[edit]

Why save those 2 of the pages and not the rest? You may be right, but I dont understand it. Thanks Jabencarsey 20:48, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glomp (3rd nomination)

[edit]

They're at it again. You might want to weigh in on this if you're so inclined.--み使い Mitsukai 23:26, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glomp rewrite

[edit]

I just went and did a rewrite of the article to try to remove the OR and add some encyclopedic work to it. Can you take a look and see if there's anything I missed? Thanks.--み使い Mitsukai 01:03, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD advice

[edit]

Kappa, I'd like some advice on deleting certain articles. While clicking through random links I ran across Dick Nasty and Wesley Pipes, which seem to me to fail to meet a number of normal deletion guidelines like verifiability and importance. (They may be notable in their field but the articles do not assert it by, for example, stating number of films). There is also no evidence of recognition by write-up in the wider world, such is usually required for minor authors, non-porn models, and so forth. I'm sure there are more where these came from. But as I said if there is already a more or less consensus so that they will be deprodded or saved at Afd, then there's no point in even bringing it up. I'm new enough that if this has been gone over before I will have missed it. Appreciate your input. Thatcher131 02:31, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Holiday

[edit]

The Holiday is going to be used as the page for the 2006 movie. That's why i'm deleting it, so i can do a page move. Crumbsucker 00:39, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No change, the voting needs to be based on what is listed on the "Redirects for deletion" page. Crumbsucker 00:52, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why? Kappa 00:54, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Subdivisions of Chad

[edit]

Hi! I've noted that you created the article, using a part of the French article. I wanted to ask if you would have anything against me renaming the article Regions of Chad: the French article after all preferred Subdivisions because they included also prefectures (1960-98) and departments (1998-2002) periods, while in the English wikipedia Prefectures of Chad is a separate article, and the present Subdivisions of Chad includes only the present Regional phase. Aldux 11:49, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Award

[edit]
I award this barnstar to a Wikimentor with patience and negotiation skills!

Thank you, Kappa!--Tdxiang 陈 鼎 翔 (Talk)ContributionsContributions Chat with Tdxiang on IRC! 03:49, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Trendy

[edit]

You deprodded it, now it's at AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobby Trendy. NickelShoe 14:00, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kirven's

[edit]

Per the debate on DRV, I undeleted this and listed it at AfD. I'm not sure there's much point relisting a stublet like this, but it was asked for. -Splashtalk 00:20, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you around?

[edit]

Greetings friend - on a wikibreak? Coming back soon? Reply by email, if you prefer. Cheers! BD2412 T 16:43, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Allow me to echo the words of BD2412, I hope that all is well. Best regards, Hall Monitor 00:23, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kappa/5&oldid=1143731122"