User talk:Kapish1122

Your user talk page is not eligible for db-u1. Do not make this request again. --Yamla (talk) 12:41, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gahirat moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gahirat, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 14:40, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 18:14, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Terich. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 18:17, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Najaf ali bhayo per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Najaf ali bhayo. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:37, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ayun moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ayun, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 04:08, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kapish1122 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please release my account i want to write articles and i am sorry for my mistakes will not repeat my mistake Kapish1122 (talk) 13:36, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason you were blocked. Yamla (talk) 14:25, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kapish1122 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please unblock this account i want to name this account and want to delete all my contributions kindly delete my all contributions and this talk page Kapish1122 (talk) 08:09, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You need to address the abuse of multiple accounts. Also, you need a good reason to be unblocked; deleting all your contributions isn't a worthwhile reason to unblock you. PhilKnight (talk) 12:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Confirmed block evasion as Pineen and as WP:LOUTSOCK back in June, and attempting to mislead us about sockpuppetry over at User talk:Balach warriach in July. There's Possible further block evasion more recently. In any case, nobody's going to unblock this account to delete contributions. --Yamla (talk) 10:23, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]