User talk:Kapeter77
Kapeter77 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My edits were UNDO-ed by an editor although we had a discussion about it. Once more: I tried to convince him before my undo but he didn't take my arguments into consideration that is why I changed his UNDO. Undoing without a proper reason is a bad thing. I would like to work on Wikipedia, please, let me do this. Kapeter77 (talk) 20:45, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The mere fact that a discussion takes place does not permit you to demand that your edits be permitted and edit war to keep them there. You must respect the result of the discussion- and if there is no clear result, you do nothing. Being correct- if you are- is not a defense to edit warring, because everyone in an edit war believes they are correct. Until you understand policy on edit warring and the proper ways in which to resolve a dispute, the block is appropriate, and I am declining your request. (talk) 21:51, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Kapeter77 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I promise to oblige the rules as I always tried to do but only if I am repsected, too. Is that an argument, that: "I think the attitude displayed here speaks for itself."? I would like an open debate about it, with arguments. As I know, we live in a civilised society and we have rights. It is not only my case. We are all human beings so we deserve RESPECT if we are asked to obey some RULES. You didn't let me any other choice to communicate and I do not know if there is any for a "blocked" user" but I am a sincere man. Yes, it is true I went into a "edit war" which is bad but I had my reasons. My edits were UNDO-ed by an editor called Ermenrich although we had a discussion about it. Once more: I TRIED TO CONVINCE HIM but he didn't take my arguments into consideration. Undoing without a proper reason is a bad thing. This is really bad, I have worked on it a lot. Can you do anything? If there are rules, there should be rights as well. I have been working on Wikipedia for years and if anything else, this should be respected. I would like to go back to my work not because it is "worth" but I have some projects that I would like to continue about nature, geography, etc, if it really bothers you I will not post anything about Hungarian history (although I know it quite well as I was born here but it seems to me some editors know it better). I would like to make Wikipedia better and I try to think that is your purpose, too. I do not want to leave Wikipedia and I hope that is not your intention, too. So all I ask is let me work and do not UNDO my edits without any proper reasons. You should first examine this question upon your side and only then block us. Thanks in advance: Kálmán Péter, Budapest, Hungary Kapeter77 (talk) 20:45, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Whether the content of your edits was correct or not is largely irrelevant to your block. You are blocked because your behaviour - reverting the article to your preferred version without discussion - was disruptive. In order to be unblocked, you will need to indicate your understanding of this, and explain what you will do to avoid becoming involved in such edit wars in the future. Yunshui 雲水 08:23, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I have decided to leave Wikipedia. It hurts me bacause it was a part of my life but what you have done to me here is unacceptable and I do not need this kind of treatment. Wikipedia is on a very bad way.Shame on you all.
Bye: Péter
- I'm sorry to hear this. Declined unblock requests cannot be removed while the block is in effect, so I have restored them. If you change your mind in the future, you are welcome to make a new request. 331dot (talk) 21:59, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Democratic opposition (Hungary), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Pilis problem
[edit]Hello, Kapeter77
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username North8000 and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Pilis problem, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pilis problem.
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 20:22, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Democratic opposition (Hungary)
[edit]
Hello, Kapeter77. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Democratic opposition (Hungary), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Democratic opposition (Hungary)
[edit]
Hello, Kapeter77. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Democratic opposition".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:25, 5 April 2021 (UTC)