User talk:Kaniket

Welcome!

Hello, Kaniket, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Sanjay Jain, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -Porchcrop ^{(talk|contributions)} 03:50, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sanjay Jain

A tag has been placed on Sanjay Jain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -Porchcrop ^{(talk|contributions)} 03:50, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dilip Mookherjee

A tag has been placed on Dilip Mookherjee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Oda Mari (talk) 04:14, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Sanjay Jain worked, and it has been automatically reverted. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here. Thank you.
SoxBot III (talk | owner) 05:24, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kaniket

There has been a Sockpuppet investigations initiated because of an entry I created two years ago. I am Kumar Aniket, (thus username kaniket) an Assistant Professor in Economics at the University of Cambridge. Two years ago when I started experimenting on Wikipedia, I created the research profile of some people who have made significant contribution to the literature on Development Economics. My presumption was that experts in the field should have their work accessible to the public. All the articles I have created more than satisfy the Notability for Academics test or the so called `professor test'. The people who suggested deletion of some of the articles are not applying the Notability for Academics criterion properly.

0n 17th October 2011, I was referred for a sockpuppet investigation for my contribution to the page of Maitreesh Ghatak. Maitreesh Ghatak is an eminent Professor in Economics at the London School of Economics. He obtained his Phd from Harvard University and worked as an Assistant Professor at the University of Chicago for six years before being tenured at the London School of Economics. He has made significant contribution to the literature on Economic Development and is considered a leading thinker in the field. His publication record more than justifies this assertion. Having said that I did not make an subjective statements when I created the page. My entry was absolutely factual, with nothing on Maitreesh Ghatak's page that cannot be personally verified.

I am extremely disappointed that Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kaniket has been initiated on my account. Everything that I have done has been above board. I am extremely disappointed that this investigation has been initiated without any basis. I would be grateful if this could be resolved at the earliest. I am happy to be contacted for this purpose on my official University of Cambridge email address (the address in my preferences) if need be. kaniket (talk) 21:27, 17 February 2011 (UTC) kaniket[reply]