User talk:Kandazburg

February 2011

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for One account only please. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Peripitus (Talk) 11:04, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kandazburg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked by Peripitus on account of having multiple accounts. Not only is this untrue, but no evidence was provided by Peripitus for the claim that I have multiple accounts, so their claim is unsubstantiated. Furthermore, as can be viewed from my contribution history, no unconstructive edits had been made from my account leading up to the block. In the time since my registration, I acted strictly in line with Wikipedia policy and did not commit any vandalism although I was wrongly accused of vandalism in one case when I was only making constructive improvements to an article. A justification for the block by Peripitus - demonstration of definitive evidence for the claim that I have multiple accounts - would be justified. This is, after all, Wikipedia: substantiation for claims is important, is it not? Ultimately, an unblock would be in order since Peripitus's reason given for the block - that I have multiple accounts - is not only unsubstantiated but completely false. Please review my case and act in an appropriate and rational manner. Thank you. --Kandazburg (talk) 17:01, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Per the evidence submitted below. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:26, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notes on blocking.

The reason I concluded this is a sockpuppet account is

Edits to Pogo, Pogo (electronic musician), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pogo (electronic musician) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pogo (electronic musician) (2nd nomination) convince me that
- you (in January) created account User:Crashmart to get Pogo (electronic musician) deleted.
- this account was created this month for the selfsame purpose.
you've probably edited via ip: 196.201.151.69 (an open proxy that is blocked) - see Special:Contributions/196.201.151.69
the edits for Crashmart indicate that it was probably not your first account.

Which account do you want to edit under ? Peripitus (Talk) 08:23, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have examined your editing history, and there is no question of your being a new editor, with little or no previous experience of editing Wikipedia. It is perfectly clear that you this account is a sockpuppet of some other account, virtually certainly of Crashmart and of Karkk, and of some earlier account that I have not identified. I would be prepared to decline your unblock request, but as Daniel Case has been reviewing the request, I will do him the courtesy of leaving it for him to decide. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:02, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]