User talk:Kamryn Norland

December 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Essential oil, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Hashs^talk 23:12, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kamryn Norland, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kamryn Norland! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

I see that your additions to the article on essential oil have been reverted as "original research". I will evaluate these on the basis of what you wrote, not on the basis of what was kept (or not). If you can add citations and references to indicate the sources of the information that you added and show that it is not original research (which is not permitted by Wikipedia) then they can become a part of the article. Hoopes (talk) 22:25, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I really like the nature of what you have tried to add, which is helpful information (and may even save some cats!) However, you need to provide reliable references in order for these edits to stick. Hoopes (talk) 22:28, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]