User talk:Kamoverapo124

Welcome!

Hi Kamoverapo124! I noticed your contributions to 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC second round and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Wburrow (talk) 21:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2026 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC third round have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 16:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 17:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 18:43, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 17:10, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2024 Merdeka Tournament

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 2024 Merdeka Tournament requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.) that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 17:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kamoverapo124 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi. I just want to say that the unsourced content edit was because I thought that the news of Kyrgyzstan was banned from FIFA. Then I realized that it was fake news because I'm searching the news back and it was only the video that I sourced who says about the news. When I came back to revert the edit to the previous edit before my edit, I got blocked. And now I just learned that I need to do a research and not just believing, then made a edit that was unsourced. Kamoverapo124 (talk) 08:45, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not convince me you understand how to properly source edits. Given that you've previously demonstrated you can fall for deliberate disinformation, we'll need to leave you blocked for now. Once you can demonstrate you clearly understand WP:RS and WP:CITE, feel free to make a new unblock request. Yamla (talk) 10:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.