User talk:Kamiri~enwiki
Your account will be renamed
[edit]Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Kamiri. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Kamiri~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
00:50, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed
[edit]This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
14:47, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
June 2015
[edit]
Your recent editing history at Mirza Ghulam Ahmad shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NeilN talk to me 15:33, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Qadianin Tirade Against Jesus
[edit]@NeilN: I don't consider this anywhere close to a reliable or scholarly source. --NeilN talk to me 01:44, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
I don't know if you are working for Wikipedia or for the qadianis. the link I inserted was hardly scholarly in itself but it had links guiding you to the page from the scholarly article.
If you are Wikipedia editor or whatever, please reinstate my edits to the relevant page and add the picture I attach as evidence.
first follow this link: http://web.archive.org/web/20120216190205/http://www.irshad.org/exposed/tirade2.php within the page that opens there is this link: [http://web.archive.org/web/20101219033558/http://irshad.org/img/rk11a291.gif [[|thumbnail|Anjam-i-Atham, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 11, P. 291]] ], which is a reference to a book and a page number and for ease of reference a gif of that page is displayed.
-
Anjam-i-Atham, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 11, P. 291
Kamiri~enwiki (talk) 10:55, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- Again, this is not a reliable source. --NeilN talk to me 12:09, 5 June 2015 (UTC)