User talk:Kamikazee99

Welcome

Hello, Kamikazee99, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Active Banana (^bananaphone 19:21, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peacock words and Neutral point of view

Please note that Wikipedia frowns on the use of peacock words- words that simply imply some sort of importance without actually substantiating what that importance is. Also note that content must be presented in a neutral point of view, not the unadulterated gushings of a fanboy. Active Banana (^bananaphone 19:21, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Template:Fanpov, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Cst17 (talk) 10:35, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sarah Geronimo, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. / Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Sarah Geronimo, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Active Banana (^bananaphone 17:24, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Puffery

Please do not continue to insert puffery into Sarah Geronimo. Continued edit warring over this issue will result in you being blocked from editing.—Kww(talk) 18:49, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No question at all: "Box Office Queen" is puffery, pure and simple. It isn't a recognized title. It isn't an award given by a reputable or notable group. It has no meaning except to promote the person. Don't put it back. You've been reverted multiple times by multiple editors, which means it is time to stop including the material.—Kww(talk) 18:56, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Then include text to the effect that she received an award named "Box Office Queen" from the Guillermo Mendoza Memorial Scholarship Foundation. Don't state that she is the box office queen, and don't make it a section title.—Kww(talk) 19:10, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sarah Geronimo. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.—Kww(talk) 18:51, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:55, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job

You did a great job of providing sourced analysis and commentary at Sarah Geronimo. Thank you. The one potential issue is that only positive commentary was added. Our policies require that both positive and negative content be presented in proportion to the way that they are presented in reliable sources. You could improve the article even more by presenting any commentary that you had come across that was not simply glowing praise of the subject. Active Banana (^bananaphone 15:23, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kim Chiu‎, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. MelbourneStar☆ ^{(talk to me)} 02:12, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Sarah Geronimo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page X-Factor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]