User talk:Kameraad Pjotr

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Dear Kameraad Pjotr: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of never biting new users. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD! HighInBC 15:16, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gebruiker:Kameraad Pjotr/monobook.js

Please note that I have submitted Gebruiker:Kameraad Pjotr/monobook.js for speedy deletion from the English Wikipedia, because it appears to be a page meant to be in your user space on the Dutch Wikipedia and in fact is already there at nl:Gebruiker:Kameraad Pjotr/monobook.js.

This should not affect the page on the Dutch Wikipedia at all. Thanks for your attention to this. --Metropolitan90 21:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I'd typed a mistake, it should be User instead of Gebruiker, I was about to nominate it myself, when I realised I made a mistake. Kameraad Pjotr 10:47, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

wat is er nou dan weer?

DAt ik laatst iets zei over Steaua Boekarest kwam doordat er telkens een correct gegeven werd weggehaald. Maar wat heb ik nou gedaan, helemaal niets.. ben alleen een beetje artikelen aan het lezen. Jullie hebben ook niets te doen.

Waarom merkt iedereen dat dan aan als vandalisme? Volgens mij hebben we toch gelijk als we zeggen dat je een vandaal bent, anders zou men je er hier ook niet op wijzen. Kameraad Pjotr 20:21, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Achja, als jij 't zo wil noemen, geen probleem. Ik geef niet zo om wikipedia als jij. Wikipedia lees ik zo nu en dan voor het plezier. Maar meer ook niet, op de UvA kun je namelijk niet met zulke zwakke en niet-deskundige artikelen aankomen. Dus vandaar dat ik vind dat jullie je niet zo hoog moeten waarderen en voor het minste of geringste een persoon een vandaal noemen.

Pjotter, je begint vrij kansloos te worden

Waarom heb je me op de nederlandse ook al geblokkeerd? mn broertje heeft een maand geleden een beetje lopen klieren op de nl'se site en nu kom je daarmee nogeens aanzetten. Damn kerel, dit is te triest.

oo, lees nu net dat je nog maar 16 bent.. tsja, dan heb je idd ook niets anders te doen. Zoek toch een meisje ofzo. haha

Als ik iemand blokkeer op de Nederlandstalige wikipedia, dan zijn daar gronden en redenen voor. Als ik de richtlijnen niet zou volgen, zou ik niet lang moderator blijven. Als je echter meent mij een beetje te moeten op stang jagen en onzin publiceren, dan ben ik nog meer van oordeel dat je blokkade terecht was. Kameraad Pjotr 15:23, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kerel, het is al meer dan een maand geleden dat dat gebeurde.. vind je nou zelf niet dat je wat te laat met je blokkering komt. Ik snap jullie bezigheid niet. Wil je je site daadwerkelijk verbeteren, gebruik dan voor ieder stukje tekst een bron. Vermeld je bronnen beter, zodat deze encyclopedie daadwerkelijk gebruikt kan worden als betrouwbare bron. Maarja, als je ooit naar een uni gaat, begrijp je wel wat ik bedoel.

Voor nu wil ik je vragen om mn block' op te heffen op de NL pagina.

Ik hef de blokkade niet op en je mag blij zijn dat ze niet verlengd wordt. Kameraad Pjotr 18:14, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperbolic angle

Hello Kameraad:

Yes, you have posted a graphic on the hyperbolic angle page but it is inappropriate: Please check also the hyperbolic sector article. The approach given is based on the hyperbola y = 1/x .

Your graphic has the parametrized hyperbola (cosh a , sinh a) which presumes the hyperbolic angle quantity. Could you replace the graphic with an appropriate one? Rgdboer 22:01, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Groet

Hoi Kameraad Pjotr, leuk om te zien dat je Portaal:Jazz weer hebt genomineerd :) (ik kijk nog wel eens wat er zoal gebeurt) . En succes met je kandidaatstelling voor de arbcom, als ik kon had ik voor je gestemd natuurlijk. Ben nu als ano hier, ben al zo lang niet meer ingelogd dat ik mijn wachtwoord niet meer wist... Groetjes, Freestyle —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.123.186.64 (talk) 21:49, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Danku; het portaal is een pareltje. Jammer dat je niet meer (mag) komen op nl. Nog heel veel plezier met wat je ook doet (ik veronderstel dat het iets internettechnisch is, je bijdragen op nl: onder de loep genomen) en hopelijk kom je ons snel terug vervoegen! In elk geval bedankt voor het bericht! Kameraad Pjotr (talk) 20:33, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File Coat_of_arms_of_Ladonia.png should be restored

You have remove File Coat of arms of Ladonia.png with description reason=No where on the website does it say that the logo is in the public domain. I have inform you, that I have approve of usage this Coat of arms by Lars Vilks personally, in Cabinet mail list. That fact was posted in New Herald tribune also (have lost where). You can mail him - lars.vilks at swipnet.se 89.196.11.108 (talk) 18:34, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kameraad Pjotr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kaliningroblast-Flagge.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kaliningroblast-Flagge.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kameraad Pjotr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kameraad Pjotr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sysop Commons

Hallo Kameraad Pjotr, ben je nog steeds Sysop daar? Op je UP hier staat van wél. Grts. :)- Lotje (talk) 11:29, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]