User talk:Kamanipour

Welcome!

Hi Kamanipour! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! AntiDionysius (talk) 14:03, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Kamanipour (talk) 03:59, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proxy edit requests

Please stop asking editors to edit extended-confirmed-protected articles on your behalf.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Kamanipour (talk) 18:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are still requesting that editors add content to extended-confirmed articles covered by Arbitration Remedies on your behalf by posting on their user talk pages. If you continue to do so you will be blocked from editing.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:01, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did this because no one answered me on the talk:Iran page! Kamanipour (talk) 03:13, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Poor sourcing

You are using unacceptable sources to add, or attempt to add, the same content across multiple articles. The focus on this single author is WP:UNDUE and the sources you are using in no way meet Wikipedia's reliable sourcing criteria. Please stop.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:51, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but these sources in Persian Wikipedia are very reliable and known to the people of Iran. Kamanipour (talk) 04:51, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo A theater takes its name from this book, in which Mina Vahid, the star of Iranian cinema, plays, I swear to God, open the link below! This can be a very important resource:

[1]https://abadis.ir/fatofa/%D9%85%DB%8C%D9%86%D8%A7-%D9%88%D8%AD%DB%8C%D8%AF/ Kamanipour (talk) 14:47, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Each Wikipedia has it's own policies and guidelines regarding sources; the English Wikipedia has more strict requirements than many other wikis. -- Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:46, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo Yes, I know, there are many other sources that directly refer to this book, is it possible to restore the content that you deleted? I will provide you with as many sources as you want. Kamanipour (talk) 17:19, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need sources that refer to the book, you need sources independent from the book that explain why its use is particularly pertinent for the article you're trying to add it to. Given that Wikipedia doesn't have an article on the book or the author, notability has not been established and the material should not be given such WP:UNDUE prominence. The fact that you are attempting to add this same paragraph across multiple tenuously-related articles is not helpful.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:24, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo It is written about this book in Mina Vahid's article on Wikipedia, have you read Mina Vahid's article yet?! Kamanipour (talk) 18:56, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo Did you read Mina Vahid's Wikipedia article? Kamanipour (talk) 09:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo You should return the content you deleted because I just found out today that Mina Vahid owes her current fame to this book. Kamanipour (talk) 08:17, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should return the content you deleted because I just found out today that Mina Vahid owes her current fame to this book. Kamanipour (talk) 08:15, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is becoming clear that you have some sort of conflict of interest with this book; your sole purpose in editing Wikipedia has been to try to spam a paragraph regarding this book, either by adding it directly or canvassing others to do it for you. I see that you're still canvassing, despite my warnings. You cannot canvas editors to edit WP:EC-protected articles on contentious topics on your behalf. I'd block you myself if I hadn't been trying to explain this to you for so long. You are here for self-serving purposes and violation our policies and guidelines in doing so.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:05, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 17:11, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]