User talk:Kamal684

Banda Singh bahadur was a Brahmin not rajput.

July 2021

Hello, I'm Ts12rAc. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Chandra Shekhar Azad, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 11:13, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chandrashekharaazad was a brahmin and his gotra was shandilya.unke gao me bhi sbhi ka gotra Shandilya hii. Kamal684 (talk) 11:32, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You need to supply a reliable source. You have been reverted multiple times and are now edit warring Dāsānudāsa (talk) 13:08, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Arjun Rampal. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Arjun Rampal was changed by Kamal684 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.863848 on 2021-07-07T11:35:50+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:35, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DEFCON5. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Arjun Rampal, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. defcon5 (talk) 05:56, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kamal684! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Arjun Rampal that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. defcon5 (talk) 05:57, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Banda Singh Bahadur. RegentsPark (comment) 18:08, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see a rather long list of warnings above and note that, despite all these warnings, you continue to add unsourced information to articles. This is WP:Disruptive editing and you are in danger of getting blocked fairly soon. Please also note that notification below. FYI. --RegentsPark (comment) 18:12, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Community sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--RegentsPark (comment) 18:13, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Banda Singh Bahadur. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 09:33, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've extended your block to 1 week for block evasion ([1]). Given your history (100% of your edits have been reverted), the next block will be an indef block. I strongly suggest you stay away from Wikipedia until your block expires and read WP:V and WP:RS before you make any edits after the block expires. --RegentsPark (comment) 13:38, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hrithik Roshan have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hrithik Roshan was changed by Kamal684 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.891704 on 2021-07-19T03:03:04+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:03, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Banda Singh Bahadur) for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RegentsPark (comment) 12:27, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Porus. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Porus was changed by Kamal684 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.937357 on 2021-07-20T13:07:45+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:07, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RegentsPark (comment) 13:40, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]