User talk:Kalypso77
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Travel 2.0, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:20, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Update
[edit]If you recreate the article, please note that Wikipedia is not a collection links. It's fine to mention sites/companies that are notable enough to merit their own article (Expedia, Travelocity, Fodors, but links to non-notable companies should not be listed on the page per WP:SPAM/WP:EL. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:01, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Recreated
[edit]I recreated Travel 2.0, adding necessary sources and removing the lists of links (which would violate WP:EL. Cheers, OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:25, 5 April 2007 (UTC)