User talk:Kalnox

This is Kalnox's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Code Aster has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Code Aster. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 22:30, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Code Aster (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Winged Blades of Godric was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Code Aster and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Winged Blades^Godric 13:36, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Kalnox, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Winged Blades^Godric 13:36, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Code Aster concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Code Aster, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Code Aster

Hello, Kalnox. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Code Aster".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 14:59, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New submission with references

Hi everybody,

First of all, thank you for your proofreading! I just submitted a new version of this page, I hope a better one than before :-) Previously, I could not receive emails from Wikipedia so I missed some of the comments, sorry for that... I think that the importance of this software is underrated, I added some references to the page to show it.

I did a little research over similar software :

Without wikipedia page (lower rank is better): https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/code-aster.org 295,205

I also checked the language distribution and the manager of the Code_Aster for Windows site provided this ranking of countries by number of users:

1) France (as expected) 2) Italy 3) Japan 4) Germany 5) United States 6) United Kingdom 7) India 8) Spain 9) Canada 10) Brazil 11) South Korea 12) Russia ... 132) Togo

As one can see, English speaking countries are well represented. The Code_Aster for Windows is an English only site and Code_Aster has been translated to English, so I think that it should not be considered a local software at all,

I hope this helps, please tell me if I should do more,

Best regards

Your submission at Articles for creation: Code Aster (May 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

[1] is your best source. Please find more like this and we will be able to accept. Unfortunately acceptance here has to be held to a higher standard due to previous consensus to delete. I don't think things have changed significantly in the year or so since.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Code Aster and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Code Aster, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Kvng (talk) 13:51, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]