User talk:Kallarmagan
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Kallarmagan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Kallar (caste). I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Sitush (talk) 10:52, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
June 2012
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Kallar (caste). When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 10:53, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Caste sanctions
[edit]I feel that you need to be aware that articles such as Kallar (caste) are subject to general sanctions. This means that you need to be particularly careful when contributing to the article. I attach the formal explanation below and I also suggest that you read up on our attitude to edit warring, since if you persist in reinstating your contributions without discussion it is very likely that you will be blocked from contributing to Wikipedia for a period and may even be subjected to a wider ban preventing you from contributing to Kallar-related issues for a considerably longer period. Please be careful. - Sitush (talk) 12:26, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
|
The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions. |
Final warning: if you make those same edits to Kallar (caste) again, I will request that you be blocked. Those edits violate several different Wikipedia policies, including WP:NPOV, WP:OR, and WP:V. If you don't understand the policies, please ask and I will explain. But your continued significant disruption has to stop, even if it means we have to prevent you from editing. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:08, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:20, 28 June 2012 (UTC)- Futhermore, considering you were warned about the extant, community-authorised discretionary sanctions, and yet chose to persist in editing disruptively, I am hereby imposing an editing restriction on you: you are prohibited from making any edits relating to the Kallar caste across all namespaces (i.e. everywhere on Wikipedia) for three months. Please note that this restriction applies to you as a person and not only to this account and that violating this topic ban will result in the imposition of increasing blocks. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:23, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
block appeal rejected
[edit]The user has appealed the block but without understanding the reason they got blocked. The appeal was rejected. Secretlondon (talk) 23:34, 28 June 2012 (UTC)