User talk:Kaligelos

Welcome

Hello, Kaligelos, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Active Banana (^bananaphone 22:16, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gelus

Hi! "Gelus" is a modern transliteration of the god's name, which was historically rendered in English as "Gelos". If you do a Books search under "Gelos" you'll find tons of references specifically discussing Gelos as a god, including Apuleius, Plutarch, and others. I suppose we could move the Gelus article to Gelos (Greek god) (there's already a Gelos, a commune in France), but we might instead want to hatnote Gelos to direct anyone looking for the god to Gelus. What do you think? --NellieBly (talk) 23:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A revert of a change you suggested for WP:TITLE

FYI: Reverting part of a change you suggested to WP:TITLE back in May regarding "recognizability" is being discussed here: Wikipedia_talk:Article_titles#Clarification_of_recognizability_lost. --Born2cycle (talk) 09:30, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of wasei-eigo

The article List of wasei-eigo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is made redundant by List of gairaigo and wasei-eigo terms and wikt:Category:Wasei_eigo.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Makkachin (talk) 13:51, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of wasei-eigo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of wasei-eigo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of wasei-eigo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 22:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]