User talk:Kalaong

Welcome!

Hello, Kalaong, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Koveras ^☭ 06:10, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:The_Smoke_Ring.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:The_Smoke_Ring.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 11:18, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Tannot Root Farscape.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tannot Root Farscape.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:13, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Schlock Mercenary characters on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- lucasbfr ^talk 05:14, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon Lucas, he goofed (though if he hadn't, I would have). It's easy to mistake the adding of "ominoooooous hummmmmmm" (or whatever it is) as vandalism. -Patstuart^{(talk)(contribs)} 05:16, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

January 2007

Hello, your recent edits to Niki Sanders have been identified as original research and reverted. Please do not add your personal opinion(s) or unverified claims to Wikipedia.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ace Class Shadow (talk • contribs)

Feburary 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page Contact lens do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Feezo (Talk) 23:11, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Goldschlager Article

I believe the following sentence from the Goldschlager article was written by you: This reaction is typically known to physicians as "gold fever." We have tagged it as being unverified. If you could please find verification or remove the unverified statement, it would be appreciated. Thanks! CKnapp 04:15, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Building up the Last Exile page

think maybe we have enough data to create pages for the two worlds of Last Exile?(Disith & Anatoray) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Murakumo-Elite (talk • contribs) 19:20, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inuyasha (character)

Welcome to Wikipedia. You are free to edit any pages that you can. However, when making such big changes to articles like Inuyasha (character) it is generally a good idea to seek a concensus at the discussion page. Your additions appear to be extra commentary on his characteristics, which have already been mentioned in fewer words.

Thank you,

Tourskin (talk) 19:48, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Bionic Commando Rearmed‎. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Girl Genius

Dear Kalaong,

This is, obviously, over half a year overdue, but I was working on the Wikia at the time of your edits.

Although I understand your enthusiasm and appreciate your energy, I just spent about three hours removing your misquotes, blatantly un-canonical assumptions and poor structure from the GG article. Please read your source material far more carefully in the future. Exemplia gratis: There is no 'Tarvek, Prince Aaronev VII', Aaronev was his father's name. Two sentences of Zeetha and one of Krosp are far more informative than five overstuffed paragraphs on Lucrezia and Agatha's putative romances. Klaus Wulfenbach is not inferior to his son, he loathes the Heterodyne Boys books and is not obsessed with cutting into people's brains. He IS a construct, we don't know the circumstances. And for Goddess's sake, the wings are just wings, they're not symbolising the Pax Wulfenbach or anybody's alliance with anybody.

Corgi (talk) 05:36, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Atlas Shrugged reception

Relax. It's my understanding that the movie is a coup in Hollywood, and most of the establishment isn't giving it a fair shake. And that sucks. However, Wiki policy explicitly shoots down the inclusion of user rating poll numbers, and specifically names RT and Metacritic as examples of what's not cool. When and if CinemaScore or similar figures come out for the movie--not to mention the box office and per-screen earnings--in mainstream media, we'll throw them in the article, and you and I can feel good knowing that justice has been done, and within Wiki policy to boot. -Digiphi (Talk) 23:18, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kalaong. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kalaong. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kalaong. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the Predator 2 plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 02:21, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]