User talk:Kalaha/Archive3

Image:Oscar Wendt.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Oscar Wendt.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Panarjedde 00:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dan Thomassen.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dan Thomassen.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Panarjedde 00:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:André Bergdølmo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:André Bergdølmo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Panarjedde 00:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jesper Grønkjær.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jesper Grønkjær.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Panarjedde 00:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fredrik Berglund.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fredrik Berglund.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Panarjedde 00:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Michael Silberbauer.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Michael Silberbauer.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Panarjedde 00:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tobias Linderoth.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tobias Linderoth.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Panarjedde 00:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Brede Hangeland.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Brede Hangeland.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Panarjedde 00:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hjalte Nørregaard.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hjalte Nørregaard.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Panarjedde 00:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lars Jacobsen.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lars Jacobsen.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Panarjedde 00:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jesper Christiansen.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jesper Christiansen.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Panarjedde 00:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Royal League

Hello, Kalaha!

You're danish (I'm swedish), so you surely now about Royal League 2006-07. What about creating an article with detailed results from every match in the tournament. Look at UEFA Champions League 2006-07 - Group Stage standings & results... /81.231.9.193 16:05, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And what about a goalscorer list? /81.231.9.193 16:19, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FCK GA

Jeg har faktisk puslet lidt med ideen selv, og det lyder ikke helt tosset. Det kunne være fedt at få alle Superliga klubberne op på det niveau. Lige nu bruger jeg Wikipedia til afslapning og har derfor ikke stor lyst til "bundne opgaver", men en god ide, og jeg skal prøve at lave nogle edits på FCK fra tid til anden. Poulsen 20:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Artiklen er meget bedre end tilbage i oktober, og synes sagtens du kan nominere den til GA igen. Det kunne være en ide at skrive et eller andet "svar" på Talk:F.C. Copenhagen til kritikken, så den næste "bedømmer" kan se der er sket noget siden. Poulsen 20:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Euro templates

Hej Kalaha, jeg vil lige gøre opmærksom på at der (indtil videre) er konsensus om at Euro templates ikke skal laves. Du kan se diskussionerne her og her. Jeg har føjet Danmarks EM 92 template til sidstnævnte diskussion. Poulsen 10:26, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jeg kan kun give dig ret i at den ville være brugbar, men det er mest fordi de fleste Euro 92 spillere ikke har andre templates. Men når jeg har indstillet at de andre landes Euro templates skal slettes, så må jeg jo tage konsekvensen selvom det er Danmark. Men nu er det jo ikke sådan jeg kan slette noget, så jeg vil foreslå du argumenterer imod sletningen her, det kan være folk vil give dig ret i templates for vinderne ku være en god idé? Poulsen 10:49, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nej, jeg ved heller ikke hvorfor de ikke er slettet/den notits ikke er fjernet. Jeg har fjernet notitsen, så må "man" enten brokke sig eller re-nominere den - jeg gider ikke selv re-nominere den. Poulsen 16:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP Munich

Hello,

You are invited to join WikiProject Munich!

There are a lot of things to do in this project. From creating new articles to finetuning articles into featured article status.

How can you help?

You can join a Task Force.
You can help comform Munich-related articles to Wikipedia Policy.
You can get free Munich-related images under GNU Free Documentation License.
You can create and edit of Munich-related articles.
You can do translations from German Wikipedia to English Wikipedia on Munich-related articles.
You can help do assessments of Munich-related articles.
You can help expand articles currently in the Stub-class and Start-class.
You can help reference articles.
Since original research is against Wikipedia policy, you can research topics to expand. This means you don't need to know anything about Munich.
You can help expand stubs and start-class articles and help finetune other articles into Featured article status.

A WikiProject of this nature is very broad. Munich has a rich history in sports, culture, politics along with many more topics. Feel free to help out in your area of interest.

If you want to check the project out you can click the link above. If you want to join the project, you can sign up here.

If you have any questions feel free to contact myself or any other member of the project.

Kingjeff 14:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Football AID 17 - 24 December

Thank you for participating in the Football AID vote this week.

Preston North End F.C. has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

Football AID 24 - 31 December

Thank you for participating in the Football AID vote this week.

Italy national football team has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

Untagged image

An image you uploaded, Image:Skagencoat-arms.jpg, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 12:17, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Region Nordjylland coa.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Region Nordjylland coa.png. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Valentinian ^{(talk) / (contribs)} 14:28, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file did not depict the correct logo. Valentinian ^{(talk) / (contribs)} 14:28, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Danish football champions

Lige præcis. Har også tænkt på at nominere den, men som du siger mangler der billeder. Jeg ved ikke lige hvad der skal gøres. Poulsen 11:23, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nej, det eneste jeg kan komme i tanke om, er at uploade pokalen [1] under fair use, ligesom i den svenske artikel. Poulsen 11:32, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Der er angivet nogle argumenter for hvorfor den er fair use, hvilke også ville gælde for et tilsvarende billede af den danske pokal skulle jeg mene. Men det virker ikke som om der er håndfaste regler for hvornår noget er "fair use", og det handler vist mest om bare at give en grund man selv synes er god.. Poulsen 11:39, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, og du kunne også sagtens bruge argumentet om at "it significantly adds to the general feeling of the article", som der står under billedet af den svenske pokal, til at retfærdiggøre UEFAs billeder som fair use. Men det skal jeg slet ikke gøre mig klog på! Poulsen 11:46, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FCN cat

Jeg ved ikke lige hvordan den klub er organiseret/opstået. Man kan sige f.eks. tidligere KB og B1903 spillere er ikke FCK spillere, men FCK blev jo også dannet som helt ny klub, omend på grundlag af de gamle klubber.. Hvis det bare var en navneforandring FBK -> FCN, og ikke en nydannet/omstruktureret klub, så synes jeg umiddelbart godt de kan være der alle sammen. Poulsen 19:34, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arjen Robben

Hey, why did you leave out the image? I assume it was an accidental removal and I already readded it. Be careful next time.
Anyway it's nice you contributed to his article. Happy editing! Arfan (Talk) 16:51, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(A very late reply to your reply on my talk page)Hmm...I don't quite understand, what do you mean by saying the image "was linked as deleted"? :-O Ar fan (Talk) 11:50, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just notice your user page, how is that possible you're a fan of F.C. Copenhagen and Arsenal F.C. and FC Bayern München all at the same time. What happens if the teams meet each other (which had happened), who would (did) you choose to support? Just asking because this confuses me. I always thought a faithful football fan should only support a one and only club (Oh I didn't mean to blame you for being unfaithful or anything don't get me wrong. Just a question out of interest...) Ar fan (Talk) 12:05, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bo Svensson

Da Linderoth blev anfører:

Bo Svenssons fremtid i FC København er fortsat uafklaret, men tirsdag fik forsvarsspilleren det, der kunne ligne en mindre lussing fra klubben. Han fik fjernet anførerbindet. FCK-træner Hans Backe har valgt at erstatte Bo Svensson som anfører med svenske Tobias Linderoth.

Hans Backe: »Vi er inde i en forandringsfase i FC København, og derfor har vi valgt at skifte anfører. Tobias Linderoth bliver anfører, og Bo Svensson viceanfører«

"Bo Svensson degraderet", Berlingske Tidende, 13. juli 2005 (fra Ritzau telegram)

Svensson: Det har jeg ingen kommentarer til. Der er ikke så meget at hente til det spørgsmål, lød eks-anførerens kortfattede besked

"Backe ofrer Svensson", Ekstra Bladet, 13. juli 2005

[...] træner Hans Backe har overrasket mange ved at udnævne Tobias Linderoth til anfører på bekostning af Bo Svensson.

"Debutanten elsker at spille i Parken", Politiken, 19. juli 2005

Som del af den store forandring er han blevet frataget hvervet som anfører, der i stedet er tildelt Tobias Linderoth.

"Frygt og bæven i FC København", Ringkjøbing Amts Dagblad, 19. juli 2005

Svensson og Don Ø skændes efter Viborg kamp 21/8-2005

Det er en del af forhistorien, at Bo Svensson var temmelig utilfreds, da han inden denne sæson mistede anførerværdigheden til fordel for Tobias Linderoth.

"På mit kontor i morgen - er du med!", B.T., 22. august 2005

Linderoth får karantæne og Gravgaard bliver anfører:

FCKs tidligere anfører havde inden sæsonen afgivet sit anførerbind til Tobias Linderoth, og da svenskeren var karantæneramt mod Silkeborg, tilbød han bindet til midtstopperen, men Svensson sagde nej tak.

Svensson: »Det er et overstået kapitel af være anfører. Jeg er ikke bitter, men blot glad for, at jeg nu kan koncentrere mig om mit eget spil,«

"Svensson vil ikke gå med bind", B.T., 29. august 2005

Det lyder ikke som om det var helt i overensstemmelse med Svensson's ønsker, heller ikke på hans egne kommentar om ikke at være "bitter". Hvis det var frivilligt, hvorfor så ikke bare sige det til at starte med, og hvorfor så spørgsmålet om "bitter". Men hvis du kan finde det præcise sted du læste det, kunne man lave et påhæng om at han ikke selv er enig i den udlægning jeg har præsenteret. Poulsen 14:55, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jeg har adgang til avisdatabasen www.infomedia.dk, så det er nemt lige at samle nogle klips og blære sig med sin viden, selv omkring FCK spillere ;-) Poulsen 15:09, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Skagencoat-arms.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Skagencoat-arms.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:43, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Lolland Falster Alliancen.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Lolland Falster Alliancen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:56, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MF eller FW?

Du har ret i at det virker lidt rodet, og personligt synes jeg også Romme/Martin J/Grønkjær spiller den samme plads på landsholdet (ironisk nok med Romme som den mest offensive, i mine øjne). Men, hvis DBU synes det er sådan, og du bruger DBU som kilde (hvilket er det mest naturlige, da de har størst autoritet på området), så må det være sådan.. Har du skrevet en mail og spurgt dem hvordan de kan klassificere så ens spillere forskelligt - det kan være det bunder langt tilbage, og bare aldrig er blevet taget op til overvejelse. Poulsen 18:28, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hvad med at inkludere en sætning i retning af

"The Danish Football Association has named 35 players as a core squad for these games,[2] while national team manager Morten Olsen will name individual squads for each specific match."

i slutningen af indledningen? På den måde får man spillernes grundlæggende positioner slået fast i starten af artiklen, og man kan så kombinere DBUs oversigt med Olsens specifikke udtagelser når de enkelte kampopstillinger opskrives på Wikipedia. Så skulle positionerne stemme, så vidt jeg kan se. Der er dog ingen grund til at opliste "Truppen 2006/07" på Wikipedia, da det kun er en vejledende rettesnor, uden reel indflydelse på hvem der spiller - der er opstillingerne til hver enkelt kamp perfekte. Poulsen 18:52, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

English spelling

I have noticed that you on a number of occations made several grammatical errors in your article editings. Therefore I will ask you to run your contributions through a spellchecker before publishing them. No hard feelings, just my 5 cent ;)

Image:Marcus Allbäck in Viborg match.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Marcus Allbäck in Viborg match.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ytny (talk) 18:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Skagen Station.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Skagen Station.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ytny (talk) 18:44, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]