User talk:Kailash29792/Archive 47
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Kailash29792. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 40 | ← | Archive 45 | Archive 46 | Archive 47 | Archive 48 | Archive 49 | Archive 50 |
Bombaat
Hi, the article is currently undergoing deletion. It would be a big help if you could salvage the Deccan Herald review here. The full review's words are here, but the original link is needed. DareshMohan (talk) 03:58, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Yay! I found it. DareshMohan (talk) 04:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Great! Does that also help access reviews of other old films? Also, could you please do some proofreading/correction here? Kailash29792 (talk) 10:15, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Tried my best at proofreading/correction. Not too sure on how to access reviews of older films (found this one by luck). Here lists films without articles, could you help create articles for these? (It is a humongous task to do alone) DareshMohan (talk) 02:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Great! Does that also help access reviews of other old films? Also, could you please do some proofreading/correction here? Kailash29792 (talk) 10:15, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
The page Aalambana has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review Liz Read! Talk! 01:48, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
I've declined the G6, because disambiguation rules put the proper title at Vikram Vedha (2022 film) (which is incidentally where the draft is sitting). Primefac (talk) 15:19, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:YYYY crime films category header
Template:YYYY crime films category header has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 06:03, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Rajendrudu Gajendrudu.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rajendrudu Gajendrudu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:15, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Iyarkai
Please add Kalki review (page only has one review). DareshMohan (talk) 08:11, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- From the Kalki review, the reviewer appreciated the montage shots of the cinematographer, Kutty Radhika's performance, but felt like Seema Biswas was underutilised. Is that all it says? Thanks, also add New Straits Times review. DareshMohan (talk) 21:59, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Poster
Please improve the quality of Konda Polam poster. DareshMohan (talk) 08:15, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks. Also, Danger (2005 film) (the quality is low) DareshMohan (talk) 05:50, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Dear Kailash29792! Can you upload poster of Jhummandi Naadam? Thank you! --89.110.26.59 (talk) 09:32, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
- Poster at Madurai Veeran (2007 film) is a screenshot. DareshMohan (talk) 23:31, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- When you get the time, please add posters for Naalai and Yuga (Sorry for all the requests). DareshMohan (talk) 03:50, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- No problem at all! While I'm not surprised at being unable to find a poster for Madurai Veeran, the lack of a DVD/VCD cover is shocking. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:52, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Also. Jithan needs a poster. Is the poster for Madurai Veeran at IMDb not usable? DareshMohan (talk) 18:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for your edits. The poster of Cuban Colony is lacking quality. DareshMohan (talk) 19:51, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Add the Tamil poster to Netru Indru Naalai (2008 film). DareshMohan (talk) 01:55, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Athidhi poster is lacking quality. DareshMohan (talk) 20:24, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- The current poster of the series Paava Kadhaigal is confusing it says 'film'. It released as a four part episode series. DareshMohan (talk) 08:06, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, I too don't know why. This source says, "Netflix India recently announced its first Tamil anthology film, Paava Kadhaigal" only to contradict itself later with the more correct "and for the first time, they are doing a series in Tamil". This should be somehow resolved. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:09, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for your work on posters. 1 Nenokkadine needs higher quality. DareshMohan (talk) 20:53, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Unnaruge Naan Irundhal, Agent Kannayiram need HQ posters. DareshMohan (talk) 03:31, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for your work on posters. 1 Nenokkadine needs higher quality. DareshMohan (talk) 20:53, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, I too don't know why. This source says, "Netflix India recently announced its first Tamil anthology film, Paava Kadhaigal" only to contradict itself later with the more correct "and for the first time, they are doing a series in Tamil". This should be somehow resolved. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:09, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
- The current poster of the series Paava Kadhaigal is confusing it says 'film'. It released as a four part episode series. DareshMohan (talk) 08:06, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
- Athidhi poster is lacking quality. DareshMohan (talk) 20:24, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Add the Tamil poster to Netru Indru Naalai (2008 film). DareshMohan (talk) 01:55, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for your edits. The poster of Cuban Colony is lacking quality. DareshMohan (talk) 19:51, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Also. Jithan needs a poster. Is the poster for Madurai Veeran at IMDb not usable? DareshMohan (talk) 18:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- No problem at all! While I'm not surprised at being unable to find a poster for Madurai Veeran, the lack of a DVD/VCD cover is shocking. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:52, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- When you get the time, please add posters for Naalai and Yuga (Sorry for all the requests). DareshMohan (talk) 03:50, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Poster at Madurai Veeran (2007 film) is a screenshot. DareshMohan (talk) 23:31, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Namma Ooru
Which film is Sethupathi referring to here? Assuming it is Namma Ooru Raasa given that his first two films (Love Birds, Gokulathil Seethai) were released in 1996. DareshMohan (talk) 04:09, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- It has to be. I guess even the subtitler couldn't understand what he said, hence the complete title isn't listed. It sounded like he said "Namma Ooru Ponnu", but it might be Raasa. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:40, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- Cool. I think he said "Namma Ooru Ponen" meaning that he went to the film's shooting. DareshMohan (talk) 06:05, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- He's referring to the film Nammavar. Srivin (talk) 12:22, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- Strange. I read somewhere he was rejected from that film because of his short height. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:28, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- He's referring to the film Nammavar. Srivin (talk) 12:22, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- Cool. I think he said "Namma Ooru Ponen" meaning that he went to the film's shooting. DareshMohan (talk) 06:05, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
How to revert
Hello there. I noticed your recent multiple undo reverts on Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar (film). I suggest you take a read of Help:Reverting which will explain how to revert multiple edits in one go. It is also customary to provide an explanation for reverts so that other editors understand the reason for your changes. Given that one of the edits you reverted was mine, could you please explain why? Thanks. — Manticore 04:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Performing Twinkle-like reverts on mobile - when you don't have access to your PC - is extremely hard. Because anti vandalism scripts don't exist for mobile. While you rightfully removed a copyvio image, I was trying to restore the image from before. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:27, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Ah I understand. Thanks for letting me know. — Manticore 07:02, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Thenali
If I am not wrong Jyothika is credited third onscreen [1] (0:34 - 0:50).--2409:4073:4E05:B065:202C:60E8:F174:4BC3 (talk) 14:30, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
The video is blocked. Please share with me a viewable one. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:42, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
Mahaan (2022 film)
Hi, I am not finding any much updates about the soundtrack of Mahaan (2022 film) and if you are getting any updates could you put it in the article Mahaan (soundtrack) which is split from Mahaan (2022 film). For now I have redirected the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theoder2055 (talk • contribs)
- Theoder2055, don't create soundtrack articles just for the heck of it. Only if there is enough info, and if the parent article has become too large. --Kailash29792 (talk) 07:25, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Apoorva Sagodharargal
Hello Kailash29792. I'm working on your requested copy-edit of Apoorva Sagodharargal (1989 film). I was confused by this sentence in the plot summary: Dharmaraj believes that it is Raja avenging his father's death and that he is the next target, and decides to seek out Raja's mother, and is shocked to see Kaveri, whom he believed to be dead, also present there.
If Dharmaraj believes Raja's mother (Kaveri) to be dead, then how can he be seeking her out? Rublov (talk) 00:36, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- See if it is clear now. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:54, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. The copy-edit is done. Rublov (talk) 01:47, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Naane Varuven
Ok User:Kailash29792 is there a film called Naane Varuven starring Dhanush? If there is so could you update about that film because I am not able to get any updates. -Theoder2055 (talk)
- Why not start with Draft:Naane Varuven (upcoming film)? --Kailash29792 (talk) 02:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
As you have requested to make the article on it, I have just created the article about Jog Biyog with list of adapted films. Please see it for your valuable opinion and modification, if any. Regards Pinakpani (talk) 07:34, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Bachchhan Paandey
Please edit poster name as now officially title speling change. Sush150 (talk) 14:33, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Please again change the name of poster as Bachchhan Paandey. Sush150 (talk) 03:32, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Vijay Sethupathi filmography
At Vijay Sethupathi filmography, user Majipedia keeps reverting sourced cameos. Already put a message at their user talk page. They should not remove the extended cameos from Ka Pae Ranasingam, Annabelle Sethupathi, and Kadaisi Vivasayi because sources say they are extended cameos. DareshMohan (talk) 09:12, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) DareshMohan, many sources tend to call any supporting role by a major actor as "extended cameos" (Eg. This source says Sethupathi had a cameo in Uppena). So I don't think there should be too much emphasis on them unless the role itself is trivial. -- Ab207 (talk) 15:30, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Amudhey
This source contains the text "அமுதே - மக்கள் விமர்சனம்", but when you press on the link it goes here and has text in weird format. Please convert this to Tamil text and add here DareshMohan (talk) 11:22, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- I don't know how to convert gibberish into proper words. Maybe the page has an archive? Kailash29792 (talk) 17:18, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Remake
You have removed the content remakes in Papanasam which has a table because it is irrelevant. A similar kind of remake content is also there in Osthe. Does that table in the remake content need to be removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8F8:1825:2E6F:81BC:2DBC:87ED:3268 (talk) 14:11, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Yes. These remake tables should only be at the original's article. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:29, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:LetsOTT
Hello, Kailash29792. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "LetsOTT".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:46, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your collegiality
Thank you very much for being a friendly and cooperative editor. Yours with best regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 12:53, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Kuruthipunal (film)
Hello, Kailash29792. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Kuruthipunal (film) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 04:34, 27 February 2022 (UTC) |
FLC
Hey! I was wondering if you might have a few minutes to look over the FLC for awards and nominations received by Timothée Chalamet. All the best. - Brojam (talk) 09:34, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Etharkkum Thunindhavan
Hey, like Jai Bhim Tamil film where suriya essayed the role of a lawyer, does he also essay the lawyer role in the Tamil film Etharkkum Thunindhavan?
- I don't know, and I don't care. Go by what the sources say, or wait till March 10th. --Kailash29792 (talk) 04:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Vaalee (1999 film)
Not only ajith and simran received great applause,as a new comer jyothika also was welcomed by the tamil and telugu audience.
She was getting so many offers after this and she won filmfare best debut ,dinakaran best debut and cinema express best debut too..
27.62.44.175 (talk) 04:52, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Answer me 27.62.68.172 (talk) 09:19, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- No personal attacks, please. I checked the source ( https://web.archive.org/web/20010702033533/http://www.newtamilfilms.com/news/archive/july1999.html ) and re-added Jo. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:24, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Not this one only is a source..also it is a poor source27.62.68.172 (talk) 09:26, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Answer me you jobless27.62.68.172 (talk)
No you have to answer me..please behave like a man not like both mixed combo27.62.68.172 (talk) 09:29, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Dil iruntha mariyadaiya pesuda thambi27.62.68.172 (talk) 09:30, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- Ok you win! The source reads, "Another person to have benefited from the sucess of Vaali is Jothika, even though she appeared in the movie for mere minutes. Vaali has given Jothika a good entrance into the Tamil movie field, and helped her to get many offers". That I think is equal to breakthrough, so I added her name back. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:32, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
·
- don't remove this section 27.62.68.172 (talk) 09:33, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Discussion on Talk:Bollywood re name change
Since you are a prolific editor on articles related to Indian films, I think your opinion sould be counted, whatever it may be (I'm also curious to know what the majority of users think anyway as the majority should prevail). Shahid • Talk2me 15:54, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Link pages you create
Hi, next time you make an article, please create links, so that people know the page exists. For the future... (such as Jenma Natchathram) DareshMohan (talk) 07:16, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Hi Sir I read some of your articles. It is so good. And also please try to write a Sivaji Ganesan Flimography. Siva1928 (talk) 07:40, 12 March 2022 (UTC) |
Maran Run Time
I added the source there, you removed it. You have added the same here by Archive. Archive link appears there, see? Cinzia007 (talk) 12:37, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi!
Hello, Kailash! I pinged you at a film article talk page but you did not respond. I noticed you have been active but did not reply.Krish | Talk To Me 15:56, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
16 Vayathinile
Hello, Kailash! Is the digitally restored version of 16 Vayathinile released? A source from Sify stated that it would release? Theoder2055 (talk) 17:53, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Query
Hello, Kailash29792,
I've been coming across your hundreds of CSD-tagged file redirects at speedy deletion categories. I'm curious what it is you are doing....are you retitling all of the ambiguously titled images for Indian films to better names? It seems like an enormous project you've taken on. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 06:55, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Many of them are ambiguous, some are erroneously titled, and most deserve better titles for uniformity. Yes it is an "enormous project" as you say, but a ray of hope for those who cannot move files without leaving redirects. I am certain what I'm doing doesn't violate any policy. And then there are those like Favre1fan93 who use LuckyRename and leave no redirects, even though they can manually move files without leaving redirects. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:08, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- I don't anything about LuckyRename, there are so many editing tools these days. I don't mind taking care of the needless redirects and there are plenty of admins patrolling CSD categories who can take care of them as well. It's just when I see some ambitious project like this, involving hundreds of pages, I just like to check in and see what's going on. I don't work much with images/files at all so I can't pass judgment on whether this renaming is in line with policy, I'm more familiar with categories where we can have brand new editors decide to recategorize entire areas and it causes a lot of havoc because it can be done so quickly without any special permissions. But I've seen several admins handle these deletion requests and I'm the first one to ask questions so I assume it didn't raise any questions for them. Thanks for taking on a necessary and useful but less glamorous editing project! Months ago, I had a discussion with an editor who had resized and enhanced hundreds of thousands of image files who had done all of this work unacknowledged and I just think we should be grateful for editors toiling away, not on creating FA and GA articles but on less visible tasks that make things better for readers. So, thank you! Liz Read! Talk! 05:47, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- My bitter experience at FACs with articles like Mullum Malarum and Sathi Leelavathi (thanks to Fowler&fowler and Laser brain) led me to stop pursuing FACs for life, and instead focus on making articles readable/reasonably sourced. That is, if I couldn't build a ship, I could at least keep one from sinking. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:56, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- I don't anything about LuckyRename, there are so many editing tools these days. I don't mind taking care of the needless redirects and there are plenty of admins patrolling CSD categories who can take care of them as well. It's just when I see some ambitious project like this, involving hundreds of pages, I just like to check in and see what's going on. I don't work much with images/files at all so I can't pass judgment on whether this renaming is in line with policy, I'm more familiar with categories where we can have brand new editors decide to recategorize entire areas and it causes a lot of havoc because it can be done so quickly without any special permissions. But I've seen several admins handle these deletion requests and I'm the first one to ask questions so I assume it didn't raise any questions for them. Thanks for taking on a necessary and useful but less glamorous editing project! Months ago, I had a discussion with an editor who had resized and enhanced hundreds of thousands of image files who had done all of this work unacknowledged and I just think we should be grateful for editors toiling away, not on creating FA and GA articles but on less visible tasks that make things better for readers. So, thank you! Liz Read! Talk! 05:47, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
@Ab207: Guys, could you expand this? This topic seems notable. DareshMohan (talk) 20:11, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Dishoom (March 17)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dishoom and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dishoom, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Kailash29792!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:54, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
|
ChaalBaaz
Hi sir. I'm working on the article ChaalBaaz by expanding it and adding required information. I would like to request you to assist me in doing so. You can either help with useful websites pertaining to the information regarding the production part or the reviews. Your help in any form will be highly beneficial. Thank You. Sahajitbro (talk) 16:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- Here are some articles you could use. But please convert the cast list and soundtrack table. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:52, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Poster
Add new poster to Kodambakkam (film). The current one has Indiaglitz written on it. DareshMohan (talk) 23:28, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- I don't even think that's a poster, but a wallpaper. Got access to a DVD/VCD? Kailash29792 (talk) 11:38, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- No, but thanks for changing it. Karnaa, Care of Footpath, and Zamana (2010 film) need HQ posters. DareshMohan (talk) 01:37, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Sillunu Oru Kaadhal poster currently says Jillendru Oru Kadhal. DareshMohan (talk) 02:51, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- No, but thanks for changing it. Karnaa, Care of Footpath, and Zamana (2010 film) need HQ posters. DareshMohan (talk) 01:37, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Reviews
Could you find anything from old newspapers for Ele, My Friend and add it here. This film is from the 90s and has a predominately Indian cast, so it might be in The New Indian Express. Also, can you find the Deccan Chronicle review for White Rainbow (it is in the pdf, but a link is better)? The review is titled "Powerful Portrayals Mark This Film" Deccan Chronicle 16 July 2006. DareshMohan (talk) 00:06, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Shine Tom Chacko
He is in Venghai? Couldn't find much sources to support this. Don't think he is in the end credits either. DareshMohan (talk) 00:51, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Best removed, keep only credited/sourced actors. Kailash29792 (talk) 02:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
- Wow, can't believe this IP from 2020's false edit lasted two years. Also wish the news to stop blindly copying info from Wikipedia. DareshMohan (talk) 03:28, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Don
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Don, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz Read! Talk! 16:21, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Soundtrack infoboxes
Hi, please see WP:FILMSCORE as the link you gave Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Backlog elimination drive: Album covers is for the removal of cover images from the infobox album not the removal of the infobox album. The infobox album is included im many featured and good articles such as Hoodwinked! and Blues Brothers (film) so can you please revert your removal of the infoboxes unless you can point to a directive for removing them, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 17:49, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
The Hindu sources
I don't have access to this, so can you search The Hindu archives and add sources to Kanninum Kannadikkum and War and Love. DareshMohan (talk) 02:21, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Wayback Machine [2] and Ghostarchive [3] can archive content from The Hindu while bypassing paywalls. Did you find the article(s) you wanted? Kailash29792 (talk) 02:33, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- No, because The Hindu Search Bar used to go back to the early 2000s, but now only goes back to 2009. Also, could you rename Suryavamsam (1997 film) to Surya Vamsam (1997 film). The film's title uses a space on the poster and the film and here and here. DareshMohan (talk) 03:05, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- As you noted, the search bar no longer works for articles published before 2009. This might have the article you're searching for, but it looks like a needle in a haystack. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- For the article The Don (2006 film), the review might be under here, but there are so many articles (I think they are grouped by state/city). DareshMohan (talk) 04:18, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- I couldn't find reviews for War and Love, but this, this and this seem insightful. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:58, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- The following articles desperately need sources (full of database sites, despite well written): Be-Lagaam, Agni Theertham, Pesuvoma, Ninaivellam Nee, Pudhusu Kanna Pudhusu, Thottu Sellum Thendrale, Vetri Mugam, Iru Nadhigal, Vaikarai Pookkal, Veettukulle Thiruvizha, Pokkiri Thambi, Vadakku Vaasal, and Mudhal Aasai. The films post-2000 should at least have some sources.
- Could you find any additional reliable sources for Boys and Girls Tamil film starring Govinda's son? There is a soundtrack label here and the Telugu dub here. DareshMohan (talk) 19:44, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- Please find the source of this. Couldn't find it. DareshMohan (talk) 21:05, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Here you go. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:06, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Can you find this source, the content is here? (thank you so much - the page got moved to draft - Draft:Anchil Oral Arjunan).
- Here you go. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:06, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Please find the source of this. Couldn't find it. DareshMohan (talk) 21:05, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- I couldn't find reviews for War and Love, but this, this and this seem insightful. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:58, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- For the article The Don (2006 film), the review might be under here, but there are so many articles (I think they are grouped by state/city). DareshMohan (talk) 04:18, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- As you noted, the search bar no longer works for articles published before 2009. This might have the article you're searching for, but it looks like a needle in a haystack. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- No, because The Hindu Search Bar used to go back to the early 2000s, but now only goes back to 2009. Also, could you rename Suryavamsam (1997 film) to Surya Vamsam (1997 film). The film's title uses a space on the poster and the film and here and here. DareshMohan (talk) 03:05, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Also, can you find this source? The link seems dead here. The wording of the source is "Pooja is the heroine of Dileep in Don. The Bangalore based Pooja had made her debut in Tamil with Jay Jay and later she did films like Attagasam, Thambi and the" --DareshMohan (talk) 00:53, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- If you couldn't find it, I seriously doubt I can (tried and failed). I hope you are using archive.is as well to search for archives. Are you using this as well? I can help you for 2000 reviews if you have difficulty. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:28, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- Also, can you find this source? The link seems dead here. The wording of the source is "Pooja is the heroine of Dileep in Don. The Bangalore based Pooja had made her debut in Tamil with Jay Jay and later she did films like Attagasam, Thambi and the" --DareshMohan (talk) 00:53, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- Just tried archive.is (didn't work). For film reviews, yup I use Chennai Online, Webindia123 and BizHat. DareshMohan (talk) 08:33, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Aalavandhan inspired animated scene in Kill Bill
Is this true? The content was removed here. DareshMohan (talk) 23:46, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Sam Asghari has a new comment
Your file renames
Hello, Kailash. One of your actions using movefile
came to my attention due to this G6 CSD nomination. That tag came following a move from File:Moonfall2022Poster.jpg to File:Moonfall film poster.jpg with the summary "Spaces"
. As you are probably aware, as a filemover
you need to carry out moves pursuant to the file renaming criteria, but your aforementioned move explicitly fell under the examples of files that should not be renamed. Other examples of unnecessary moves include 129837205, 129767852, 129737035 (the log summary appears misleading), 129726049 etc from the last few days.
I appreciate that after holding filemover
for four-and-a-half years, being told that your moves have been inappropriate is unpleasant. However, it is important to move files only when it is necessary. Please follow the renaming criteria in the future. Sdrqaz (talk) 20:56, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll stop for the time being. If only I had PageMover rights with the option to NOT leave redirects... But I was rejected multiple times, and how should my request be? Kailash29792 (talk) 02:59, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- Kailash, while what Fastily said is worth thinking about, whether a redirect is left behind and the moves themselves are separate issues. Having
extendedmover
is not relevant; it is the renames you are carrying out as afilemover
that I am concerned about. Sdrqaz (talk) 11:08, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- Kailash, while what Fastily said is worth thinking about, whether a redirect is left behind and the moves themselves are separate issues. Having
- Well, this is unfortunate. Since I first noticed your questionable RFD nominations for redirects in the File: namespace about 3 or so years ago, I had hoped that you would have improved your judgement calls on when a File: namespace redirect should be deleted, but instead, it seems that you have found a way to almost game the system by getting leftover redirects speedy deleted instead of taking them to RFD ... which with your nominations, has usually resulted in "Keep". After reading Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#Does G6 apply to redirects created via page move in the file namespace? (which I highly recommend you continue participating in unless another more dire discussion appears), I decided to go here and leave you a related message, just to find this section already existing. At this point, I'm thinking that you probably need to request your File Mover user right be revoked and then prove your ability to understand the responsibilities of having that right by practicing using {{Rename media}} for file move requests. I mean, obviously, it's your call, but I think I have enough knowledge of your past File: namespace edits on RFD to file a WP:ANI report. Your call. Steel1943 (talk) 05:33, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- I understand and I apologise, although most of the files I moved and redirects tagged for deletion were garbled/annoying filenames. If revoking my filemover rights is the only way to avoid WP:ANI, then so be it. But one thing is for sure: I'm done moving files for now. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:40, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Thanks
Hey, nice work adding all those Kalki reviews and improving sourcing. The quality of Wikipedia is improving because of people like you. I wish there were more people like you that could help improve Wikipedia in all languages. This notable Malayalam film -- Gajakesariyogam -- does not have an article anymore. Would be of great help to add the New Indian Express review and rescue the sources. If you could also find a New Indian Express review for Pattabhishekam (1999), then I could go through the deletion review. Thanks! DareshMohan (talk) 20:44, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- @DareshMohan: DRV is not needed when you've found new sources which establish notability, imv. Its required when you are disputing the closure itself. WP:G4 does not apply since the version you create would obviously be different. Article should be ready survive an AfD nonetheless (which takes the same time as deletion review) but it shouldn't be a concern when have good sources. -- Ab207 (talk) 08:58, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks guys. So no more deletion review (since content is different), but still need sources to recreate article. DareshMohan (talk) 09:04, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- In that case, I will need help with Dr. Pasupathy. (Small request: please add sources to old Indian films, otherwise they will get deleted). DareshMohan (talk) 00:51, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks guys. So no more deletion review (since content is different), but still need sources to recreate article. DareshMohan (talk) 09:04, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Thennilavu
Hello, Kailash29792. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Thennilavu at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 04:50, 16 April 2022 (UTC) |