User talk:Kai at BSt

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kai_at_BSt.

Welcome!

Hello, Kai at BSt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Neue Stimmen

Please use {{ill|Neue Stimmen|de|Internationaler Gesangswettbewerb Neue Stimmen}} for the competition, establishing the connection to the German article, until you create the English. It falls automatically in place to a link to English once you create it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:52, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Oh, I wasn't aware of the ill-Template. I've just translated the German Wikipedia article to Neue Stimmen. Can you please take a look if everything is alright? Thanks a lot for your help! Kai at BSt (talk) 13:19, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It looks good at a glance. "First place", instead of "1st Place", and perhaps some singers have articles in other languages? - Next time that you want translate, change one article, then translate, then link in the others, and keep adding it (without qualifying "norable" or "important") to other winners. - Nice to meet you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:36, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Thanks again for your feedback. I've changed "1st Place" to "First place", and so on. I've linked also linked articles in other languages, at least those from German Wikipedia, using the ill-template. I hope that's fine? --Kai at BSt (talk) 07:32, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Impressive! Add to List of classical music competitions, and compare to others. How about an infobox, as in the BBC for voices? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:53, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Done (both). I've also found three more Wikipedia articles to link with the ill-template. Any other suggestions on how to improve the article? Thank you so much for your help. -- Kai at BSt (talk) 11:34, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aart Jan de Geus

@Gerda Arendt: Hi and thanks again for your help with Neue Stimmen. Maybe you can take a look at Aart Jan de Geus, too? I've suggested a translated version of the German Wikipedia article on the talkpage. Your feedback would be appreciated. Have a nice weekend! -- Kai at BSt (talk) 11:37, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reinhard Mohn Prize has been accepted

Reinhard Mohn Prize, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Gbawden: Thank you very much for your review. Maybe you can take a look at Draft:Brigitte Mohn, too? Thanks again for your help, Kai at BSt (talk) 12:19, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brigitte Mohn (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by K.e.coffman were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brigitte Mohn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Brigitte Mohn, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

K.e.coffman (talk) 23:10, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kai at BSt! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! K.e.coffman (talk) 23:10, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brigitte Mohn has been accepted

Brigitte Mohn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 23:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bertelsmann Foundation North America has been accepted

Bertelsmann Foundation North America, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 22:23, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted the action above for reasons explained in this discussion. You may find the draft again at Draft: Bertelsmann Foundation North America. ☆ Bri (talk) 05:16, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bertelsmann Foundation North America, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spanish. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bertelsmann Foundation North America (November 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This needs to do more than just tell what this organization does, it must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage choose to say about this organization.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bertelsmann Foundation North America and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bertelsmann Foundation North America, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 09:34, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]