User talk:Kahriman~enwiki

Image Tagging for Image:GrandmediaSarajevo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GrandmediaSarajevo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:05, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for edit summary

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:11, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sarajevopurple.jpg

Hi Kahriman!
I was wondering if you could upload a higher res version of Image:Sarajevopurple.jpg? It's an amazing photo, and in higher res would easily pass through FPC --Fir0002 23:47, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Sarajevo is amazing place, and if I ever get the chance to travel I will be sure to go there. Unfotunately the image no looks pretty bad. Was that a native image or did you just upscale the existing one? --Fir0002 12:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Srebrenica Massacre article

Kahriman, I just saw your edits on the RS article and then saw your user page for the first time. It would appear that the Srebrenica Massacre article would benefit from your checking in from time to time. Right now, everything is OK, but earlier this year the article was swamped by nationalist sockpuppets and there was no way for one user to defend the article. If you could visit the site every now and then, that would be helpful. Live Forever might benefit from your help checking into the Markale Massacres article also. Thank you. Fairview360 05:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

The census registered the number of Muslims, bot Bosniaks. Not all Muslims are Bosniaks, and not all Bosniaks are Muslims. Also, even if Muslims=Bosniaks, those people declared as Muslims, and it's not up to us to second guess the census results.--Еstavisti 19:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About Milorad Dodik, he is the most powerful politician - head of a party that includes the President of RS, the Speaker of the National Assembly of the RS, the Prime Minister of the RS, one of the Presidents of BiH, the Prime Minister of BiH etcetc. As for him being most able, that is a widely held opinion (among all ethnic groups), but I won't insist on it.--Еstavisti 10:56, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Yugoslav wars

I've begun work on Template:Yugoslav wars. It's a work in progress, but feel free to add anything I've overlooked/haven't got round to yet.--Hadžija 18:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)--[reply]

Naravno!

Kahrimane, odmah cu! Bio sam odsutan ali ako si jos budan, neka borba za pravdu pocne!!! Vseferović 21:51, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slušaj upitao sam austrijskog korisnika User:Nightstallion (admina) da nama pomogne. On se među prvima počeo baviti oko ovog problema (za našu stranu). Pozdrav, Vseferović 03:35, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello burazere

I am impressed with the work you've done on the Bosnian "war" article (the general information). Samo naprijed ;)! I've done some work myself on the Anti-Bosniak sentiment article, take a look if you feel like Ancient Land of Bosoni

Tkz. Sarajevski Civilni Rat

Zdravo Bosnjacino!

Nominirao sao clanak o tkz. civilnom ratu u Sarajevu da bude izbrisan. Molim te glasaj na sljedecem linku. Samo utipkaj "delete" i dodaj svoj razlog. Zivio. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sarajevo_Civil_War Bosniak 20:31, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please use English

I noticed that you have posted comments on an article or user discussion page in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you are addressing your comments. This is because comments should be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. –Psychonaut 21:25, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, we will. No problem. Bosniak 08:13, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK --Kahriman 15:28, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POV-article on Sarajevo

I voted of course for strong delete, it is an absurd POV-article, but nothing surprises me any more. Let's get this POV-crap deleted. Ancient Land of Bosoni

Me again Kahriman

Hi friend. I was going to point out to you that there is an arbitration fro Osli73 case. I voted "oppose". Hope you vote too http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Osli73 Thanks. Bosniak 02:37, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps some background is in order. Only the people in the Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee are supposed to use that section (read that article for more background). One of the arbitrators (Fred Bauder) proposed that the remedies pertaining to Osli73 should be revoked, I think after Osli73 complained about them. Another arbitrator opposes the proposal. The Arbitration Committee decided on the remedies and they're the only ones that can revoke them.

I'm sure there is some place you can place comments, but I don't know where. I guess it's best to ask one of the clerks (clerks are basically administrative staff used by the Arbitration Committee). -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 05:09, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As I see, I can't vote --Kahriman 14:11, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kahriman

I have noticed that Serb propagandists use fake pre-war ethnic maps. Here is the accurate one (source: Office of the High Representative):

File:Ethnic composition before the war 1991.gif

Ethnic map of BIH, 1991.

Bosniak 03:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR on Srebrenica massacre

Selam alejkum, Kahrimane. You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Srebrenica massacre. Please cease further reverts for at least the next 24 hours or you may be blocked from further editing.--Domitius 20:38, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alejkum selam. Thank you for worning. I know about that rule. Thanks again :) --Kahriman 20:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Canvassing for Srebrenica massacre requested move

It was reported on Talk:Srebrenica massacre that you posted an announcement on the Bosnian Wikipedia encouraging users to come to Talk:Srebrenica massacre and vote a particular way on the proposed move. If the translation posted is correct, then your actions violate Wikipedia's guideline against campaigning (encouraging voters to vote a certain way) and votestacking (notifying only or primarily users who you know or suspect to share your point of view). It is best not to game the system, and instead respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building, by ceasing to make further such announcements, and instead allowing the process to reflect the opinions of editors that were already actively involved in the matter at hand. Thank you. —Psychonaut 13:06, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I am very sorry if I have broken any wikipedia rule. But, as I understand, it is OK to announce other wikipedia users about voting, and it is not OK to urge them to vote for one option? I wasn't campaigning, most of the editors on bs wikipedia, already have their account on the english. And most of them are already supporting this idea. So, if I said "go vote" or "go vote for moving the article", it is basicly the same thing on bs wikipedia. If you don't belivie me, you can see that the same article on the bs wikipedia is called "Genocid u Srebrenici" witch means "Srebrenica Genocide" or "Genocide at Srebrenica". Anyway, I have corrected my announcement and I have written that they should read the disscusion, think about options and then vote for the one option. Is that OK? And also, I am not supporting making decisions based on simple voting. I am supporting consensus, but I was informed that this kind of decisions are made by survey. --Kahriman 14:45, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you consider your suggestion to vote to be "basically the same thing" as a suggestion to vote for a particular option, then this constitutes votestacking and is against Wikipedia's policy. —Psychonaut 17:54, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RS and FBiH symbols

Thank you for the answer but I already that knows ;)

Do you have a source which will make it possible to check if these symbols are still used or not, even if they are unconstitutional?

Thanks. Rémih 14:31, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is exactly the subject of the edit war. So I can't do anything. Bye. Rémih 19:14, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Srebrenica Massacre = Srebrenica Genocide

Hi Kahriman,

Please apologize to user Opbeith for calling him genocide denier. He does not deserve to be called that way, because he has spent months and months on this article fighting against genocide denial and vandalism. When there was nobody to defend victims of Srebrenica genocide on wikipedia, Opbeith was there. You have no idea how much garbage we had to deal with - people were literary deleting paragraphs and changing numbers from 8,000 to 2,000 and blatantly denying that genocide happened. Me, Opbeith and a couple of more users were there to defend the article. Opbeith is human rights activist and there is no way in hell that he is even close to being genocide denier. While I supported your vote to rename the article to Srebrenica Genocide, I must point out to you that now I think it should stay titled Srebrenica Massacre. You know why? Let me show you. If you go to Google and type "Srebrenica Massacre" you will get tons of websites, and sizable number of these websites deny that Srebrenica massacre was a genocide. For example, emperors-clothes, self-called srebrenica research groups, antiwar (serb ultranationalist genocide denier nebojsa malic), and many others. We are lucky that wikipedia is on top of search results for Srebrenica Massacre, click to verify, and naturally most people visit wikipedia before they even skim over other search results. Please apologize to Opbeith, it's absolutely inapropriate to insult people who are fighting against blatant and widespread genocide denial. Bosniak 21:55, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright over Sarajevoatnight.jpg

What gives you the right to declare that you own copright to this image? There is only one way you could have access to this image and it is from a CD titled "Sarajevo" made by Brank Multimedia Sarajevo (www.brank.ba). I am one of the authors of this CD and the image you so blatantly declare your own is actually mine. Should you want proof, contact me at edin@butchkurish.ba. Otherwise, please remove all your references for the mentioned image (or images). 18 July 2007

Debate on the correct adjective for Kosovo

Hi! Based on your interest in the Balkans, you may be interested in the currently ongoing debate on whether we should be using Kosovo or Kosovar/Kosovan as the adjective for Kosovo. —Nightstallion 15:22, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Questions about the war

Hi ! I'd like to ask you some questions about the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina if you don't mind, as I don't know anybody who lives there. Do you accept to contact me by e-mail ? User:Spectrum_X:Spectrum_X

Unspecified source for Image:2615282-lg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:2615282-lg.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:15, 9 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 12:15, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Bosniaks: Images of notable Bosniaks for the Template:Bosniaks infobox

Please, join the discussion.

Regards, --Wusten fuchs 11:50, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Kahriman. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Kahriman~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

01:02, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

14:45, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 09:17, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]