User talk:Kagnaroos

April 2024

Hello, I'm Lynch44. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to S.T.D (Shelters to Deltas) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Lynch44 (talk) 21:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pedophile, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:37, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pedophile, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Pedophile was changed by Kagnaroos (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.969893 on 2024-05-09T16:42:48+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Best Dick Sucker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Best Dick Sucker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best Dick Sucker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pilaz (talk) 21:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Best Dick Sucker

Hello Kagnaroos, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Best Dick Sucker, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best Dick Sucker (2nd nomination).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Pilaz}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Pilaz (talk) 21:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cupcakke - Best Dick Sucker.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cupcakke - Best Dick Sucker.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Dauntless Manifesto

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Dauntless Manifesto, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]