User talk:Kagawaen
Welcome
Hi Kagawaen! welcome to Wikipedia!
Be bold in editing pages and don't let others scare you off! To sign your posts (for eg. on talk pages) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp.
|
Here are some links that you might find useful:
|
You can contribute in many ways
|
I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. If you need help, you can drop a note on my talk page or use Wikipedia:New contributors' help page. You can also type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia! - MrX 19:30, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Gifb/Boom
[edit]Hallo Kagawaen, I reckon that more readers are better served if we leave "Gifboom" to point to the plant and "GifBoom" to the network app, with a hatnote at each place, rather than create a new disambiguation page. Someone typing "Gifboom" and wanting the new page still has just one extra click to make, but someone wanting the plant gets there directly. No-one loses. Hope you agree. PamD 08:59, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello Kagawaen. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know however, regarding Pub rock (Australia) songs, that tagging articles for speedy deletion moments after creation as lacking context (CSD A1), content (CSD A3) and articles created through the Article Wizard, is too fast. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. Salvio Let's talk about it! 14:53, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GifBoom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GifBoom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 21:29, 15 October 2019 (UTC)