User talk:Kaflavha

Welcome

Hello, Kaflavha, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 20:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

July 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Germán Garmendia has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Germán Garmendia was changed by Kaflavha (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.88269 on 2016-07-18T18:23:46+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:23, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I noticed that in this edit to Cold War, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 20:17, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cold War, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. SkyWarrior 20:18, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Cold War, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 20:20, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Cold War. Sro23 (talk) 20:24, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GAB^gab 20:32, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2016 clown sightings, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. GnomeSweetGnome (talk) 19:38, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 19:41, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring notice

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of most-subscribed YouTube channels. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

This message is not to be construed as an indication of my personal disagreement with your revisions; I have placed this same notice on the talk page of the other edit warring party, RedJavelin. Life of Tau 17:11, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing (Cesa tu edición disruptiva, por favor)

Please stop removing content from List of most-subscribed YouTube channels without explanation or discussion. This continued edit warring is disruptive. Disputes should be resolved with discussion on the talk page, not by repeatedly reinstating the edits you believe to be correct (see WP:BRD).

Deje de eliminar el contenido de List of most-subscribed YouTube channels sin explicación ni discusión, por favor. Esta continua edición de guerras es disruptivo. Las disputas se deben resolver con la discusión en la página de discusión, no reinstalando repetidamente las ediciones que usted cree que son correctas (vea WP: BRD). Life of Tau 18:44, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Sakura Cartelet^Talk 23:44, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Maile (talk) 23:50, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]