User talk:KaelaWilbur

Hi KaelaWilbur!

I'm Asmaley from PJHC. It appears that we are interested in similar things and I'm excited to see what you end up working on! --Asmaley (talk) 02:21, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, KaelaWilbur, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:22, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

police unions

hi KaelaWilbur, and welcome to wikipedia. It's great that your attention was drawn by Police unions in the United States and that you edited the article. It's less great that you accused a previous editor of plagiarism in your edit summary, by saying you'd "reworded a section that had been plagiarism". That previous editor is me. The text in question was four sentences put into an indented, italicized, cited direct quote, relevant to the article, and formatted consistent with the guidance in Wikipedia:Quotations meant to make it obviously distinct from the main text. Using quotations is not plagiarism. I've restored the full quote & left your other changes. All best and happy editing --Lockley (talk) 18:55, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Hi! I think the criticism section you added to Baptists in the US was very needed and helpful, as well as your expansions in the history section. The statistics you added were also helpful. I would do a close proofread and edit for grammar and sentence flow. I would consider adding to the criticism section as well as a few of the history subsections that are only a couple sentences long. This would hopefully provide a more comprehensive understanding for a reader. You added a lot of reliable sources but possibly add more in these 2 sections I just mentioned. Overall, I think your contribution was great and very helpful! S.shedore (talk) 02:58, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you!

		The Excellent New Editor's Barnstar A new editor on the right path
		Thanks for your thoughtful work! DStrassmann (talk) 19:00, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]