User talk:K y blogg

October 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 08:07, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It seems obvious that you have previously been using IPs to vandalise MMR vaccine controversy, hence the "persistent" vandalism. Bishonen | talk 08:09, 16 October 2018 (UTC).[reply]

November 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at MMR vaccine. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Natureium (talk) 20:07, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Mumps vaccine, you may be blocked from editing. Natureium (talk) 20:13, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at MMR vaccine. Natureium (talk) 20:25, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Honest Debate on the Safety of MMR

Why are claims for safety of the MMR Vaccine reported as total fact, and yet anyone to raising concerns or making balanced corrections risks being blocked? As someone said, parts of the MMR section read like drug industry advertising. K y blogg (talk) 20:43, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MMR vaccine has been given to millions of children with no suggestion (except for that of dis-credited ex-doctor Wakefield) of any harmful effect other than the microscopically small chance of side effect openly stated by the manufacturer. ----Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:56, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it should be noted that uptake of MMR vaccine declined in the immediate aftermath of Wakefield's fraudulent paper being published. Because of this the incidence of measles infection rose and children died. For those unnecessary deaths Wakefield was directly responsible.----Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:06, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have previously been blocked for vandalism at MMR vaccine controversy (both with this account and from IPs), and have apparently now moved to edit warring to insert similar tendentious text at MMR vaccine and Mumps vaccine. You have been warned enough. I have blocked you for a month. The next block will be indefinite. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 22:21, 7 November 2018 (UTC).[reply]