User talk:KTMUSIC1

March 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kimberly Thompson has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kimberly Thompson was changed by KTMUSIC1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.890699 on 2015-03-08T18:07:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:07, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Kimberly Thompson has been reverted.
Your edit here to Kimberly Thompson was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/KimThompson.Official%7Ctitle=Kimberly) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:07, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 13:08, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:KTMUSIC1 and article Kimberly Thompson could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:33, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Kimberly Thompson, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) (User:Wtwilson3) — 13:44, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kimberly Thompson with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 13:48, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, KTMUSIC1. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Kimberly Thompson, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) (User:Wtwilson3) — 13:50, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Kimberly Thompson. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:55, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User Ceyockey might be & manipulating my persona. Who is falsely saying they are ME releasing not true information about my family and personal life. Please block non-punitive block Ceyockey from working on the page infinite. Legal threat with drawn as I am just learning the process, but as for you, you have no right to act as ME and it is You who should be blocked and monitored for falsified information. I don't even know you. I have never created a wikipedia page and I did NOT ask you to do it for me. You are wrong and of out of line. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KTMUSIC1 (talk • contribs) 14:06, 9 March 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

User:Ceyockey has falsified 90% of the content. Is harassing me and acting as ME manipulating the system and flooding lies and fabricated personal information. I do not know who :Ceyockey is but I am definitely able and willing to take legal action to clear my name against this destructive person. This is illegal and I will be appointing my lawyer to oversee this charade of defiance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KTMUSIC1 (talk • contribs) 13:21, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
I suggest you withdraw your legal threat, as it violates the no legal threats policy. In addition, Wikipedia does not allow autobiographies, especially if they remove sourced content from articles. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:30, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Also, it appears that Kimberly Thompson has been blanked by User:KTMUSIC1. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:31, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
I have warned User:KTMUSIC1 about legal threats. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:33, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Update: User:KTMUSIC1 continues to blank Kimberly Thompson despite warnings about removal of content on talkpage. They have done it after a final warning as well. Given the legal threat here as well, I would support a block. It's one thing to be unhappy with content on Wiki, it's not acceptable to delete/replace it without a consensus to do so. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:57, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Copied by KTMUSIC1 from WP:ANI contemporaneously with the above unsigned comment.

For the record, Ceyockey (talk · contribs) has performed only two edits on the Kimberly Thompson article: both of which were to revert edits made by KTMUSIC1 (talk · contribs). There is no evidence that Ceyockey has tried to impersonate Ms Thompson, nor even to write an article about her. The bulk of the article content was created by Erpert (talk · contribs), and, in the version prior to KTMUSIC1's intervention, the only statement that could have been considered negative was the statement about Ms Thompson's departure from the Seth Meyers show and the 8G Band. That fact, being uncited, could easily have been removed, leaving a perfectly valid neutral article about Ms Thompson. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:59, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimberly Thompson

Just so that you're aware, the current Kimberly Thompson article is being proposed for deletion, feel free to discuss here. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:16, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Kimberly Thompson. — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) (User:Wtwilson3) — 14:25, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Team Wikipedia I am in full cooperation in deleting the "Kimberly Thompson" page completely. Thankyou for your support in this terrible matter that's been put against falsifying me & divulging family content & personal detailing. Your noble endeavors regarding me will not be forgotten. Thankyou so much, I appreciate your team & God Bless you Team Wikipedia, best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KTMUSIC1 (talk • contribs) 14:33, 9 March 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24h for vandalism (repeated blanking the page. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

When the block expires, please instead of blanking the page participate in the deletion discussion.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:48, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

KTMUSIC1, please note that the deletion discussion (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimberly Thompson) may end in keeping the article. If you are concerned about any content in the article in its current state and are Kimberly Thompson or her appointed agent, read Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Help for guidance. If you wish to discuss the matter privately, you can email the OTRS team at info-en-q@wikimedia.org. Your email will reach a volunteer team of experienced users who help with biographical articles and privacy-related matters. Best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 16:00, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]