User talk:KS3 Maffs
|
|
Tip of the moment...
Wikipedia etiquette = Wikiquette
Another policy we value highly is Wikipedia:Etiquette—(Wikiquette)—please try to be nice to everyone, all of the time. Good natured collaboration keeps Wikipedia running smoothly and developing rapidly. It makes the Wikipedia community a friendly place to be and it makes Wikipedia a fun place to volunteer. Personal attacks are not tolerated, and may result in those responsible being blocked. If you get into a conflict, remain calm and endeavor to resolve the dispute peacefully. – – Read more: To add this auto-randomizing template to your user page, use {{totd-random}}
|
Hi
I recently added a link to the list of Java APIs, which you immediately deleted.
I don't understand the logic behind deleting such an external link.
If external links were not allowed then fine, but they appear to be allowed by the presence of other external links.
On the Java APIs page there are numerous commercial and non-commercial links which are clearly assumed acceptable by yourself and other moderators.
I've seen this kind of moderation from Wikipedia before and the rational does appear flawed. It appears a certain number of external links are allowed but no more.
Allowing come links but not others is a strange rule and contrary to free expression.
Graham —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.20.240.70 (talk) 12:10, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
AN/I FYI
[edit]Your recent actions are being discussed on AN/I. Please feel free to comment here. --Onorem♠Dil 13:33, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
You are not an administrator.
[edit]Only administrators may approve or decline unblock requests. Accordingly, I have removed your declines of User:62.189.161.120, here. Please consider this a serious warning to not decline unblock requests again. //roux 13:43, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, I genuinely didn't realise. KS3 Maffs (talk) 13:46, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
March 2009
[edit]{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below. Jac16888Talk 13:54, 9 March 2009 (UTC)KS3 Maffs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This account is not "only" being used for vandalism as Jac16888 claims above. Any poor quality edits were merely the result of misunderstandings and ignorance of policy. I am here to try and improve this site, not to make it worse. I have learned now what I can and cannot do, so I will never again perform bad edits.
Decline reason:
Simply not believable given the long string of sockpuppets this account is part of. Page locked. Mangojuicetalk 15:19, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.