User talk:KRISTEEN65

October 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Yahan Main Ghar Ghar Kheli into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to make a note in an edit summary at the source page as well. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Psychonaut (talk) 14:40, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

KRISTEEN65, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi KRISTEEN65! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 02:04, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yahan Main Ghar Ghar Kheli

Thanks for your contributions to the article on Yahan Main Ghar Ghar Kheli! I noticed the plot summary you added is extremely long—in fact, it is so long it seems to violate our policies on plot summaries. Would you please consider shortening it in accordance with the recommendations on Wikipedia:How to write a plot summary? —Psychonaut (talk) 11:38, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, KRISTEEN65. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions.
Message added 11:52, 23 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Yunshui 雲‍水 11:52, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, KRISTEEN65. You have new messages at Yunshui's talk page.
Message added 12:16, 23 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Yunshui 雲‍水 12:16, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, KRISTEEN65. You have new messages at Yunshui's talk page.
Message added 12:27, 23 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Yunshui 雲‍水 12:27, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, KRISTEEN65. You have new messages at Yunshui's talk page.
Message added 12:49, 23 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Yunshui 雲‍水 12:49, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Forking articles

Please do not fork articles (that is, creating a separate version of an existing article) as you did with Ramayan (2012 TV Series) and Yahan Main Ghar Ghar Kheli. At least for the former article, perhaps you were not aware of the existing article before you started your own version; if this was the case, please make sure that before starting a new article you do a thorough search to make sure there is not already an article on the topic. In any event, unilaterally redirecting the old article to your version, as you did at Ramayan (2012 TV Series), is unacceptable. Wikipedia is a collaboratively edited project, so generally speaking you cannot simply remove work contributed by others wholesale and replace it with your own. If you have something to contribute on an existing topic you should improve rather than replace the corresponding article. I have therefore reverted your redirect and posted a proposal to merge your version into the pre-existing article. —Psychonaut (talk) 20:15, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Zeeyanketu. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Ramayan (2012 TV Series), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, ---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 04:37, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ramayan (2012 Television Series). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Psychonaut (talk) 05:27, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

KRISTEEN65, please stop replacing the contents of Ramayan (2012 TV Series) with your own version of the article, be it via a redirect or by copying and pasting the text of your article. A merger has been proposed; ideally you should give interested editors time to discuss whether and how this ought to be accomplished. Most likely it will be decided to use the union of the information in the two articles, rather than keeping only one or the other. —Psychonaut (talk) 07:59, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback

Hello, KRISTEEN65. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

–– Anonymouse321 (now The Anonymouse) (talk • contribs) 07:06, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Yahan Main Ghar Ghar Kheli

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Yahan Main Ghar Ghar Kheli, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.bollywoodblockbustermovies.com/movies/yahan-main-ghar-ghar-kheli/2406/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Yahan Main Ghar Ghar Kheli and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Yahan Main Ghar Ghar Kheli, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Yahan Main Ghar Ghar Kheli with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Yahan Main Ghar Ghar Kheli. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Yahan Main Ghar Ghar Kheli saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Psychonaut (talk) 08:05, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove the {{copyvio}} template from articles, as you did with Yahan Main Ghar Ghar Kheli. Your action has been reverted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted, and removing copyright notices will not help your case. You can properly contest the deletion at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. If you are the owner of the material, you may release the material under the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses, as detailed at WP:IOWN. Alternatively, you are welcome to create a draft in your own words at Yahan Main Ghar Ghar Kheli/Temp. If you continue to insert copyright violations and/or remove copyright notices, you may be blocked from editing. Psychonaut (talk) 08:18, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Yahan Main Ghar Ghar Kheli Logo.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Yahan Main Ghar Ghar Kheli Logo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Psychonaut (talk) 09:08, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Yahan Main Ghar Ghar Kheli Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yahan Main Ghar Ghar Kheli Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Psychonaut (talk) 09:08, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ramayan (2012 Television Series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manthra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing, particularly copyright infringement, and abusing multiple accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:08, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- Unblock this user: This user clearly does not have any bad intentions and their edits are not disruptive , the user edit-wars but I doubt that anyone bothered to tell the user about edit warring and what it is. as for sock puppetry, the user does not seem to know what it is. The user is trying to add text in the Zee TV related articles which are in bad condition, you claim that this user is adding copyvio, I'll let you know that the first paragraph of this "copyvio" was written by ME(using one of my previous accounts, go check the Yahan Main Ghar Ghar Kheli page history if you need proof.) I even translated this text into the Hindi wiki. While trying to explain what copyvio is, other editors just templated the user again and again, having a look at the contributions of this user it may be that their English is not very good and was unable to understand the stilted English templates. Since the user is working in an area that needs a lot of attention and work, such harsh, hostile behavior and blocks should are unacceptable and should not be advocated. --Farah Desai^Talk 14:02, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the edits have been disruptive.
The lack of any warning about edit warring is irrelevant, since the block was not for edit warring.
What is your evidence that the user does not know what sockpuppetry is? I can't see any edits by this user that indicate that at all. If you have knowledge of what the user knows that I haven't seen then please share it with me, so that I can assess it.
If this account is not a sockpuppet then there are remarkably many strange coincidences, which, by an amazing coincidence, happen to connect this account with quite a large number of other accounts, each one of which has previously been determined to have been used by a sockpuppeteer.
The article you refer to has had 1442 edits. You do not tell me what "previous account" you used to create the doubtful content. Without more help, looking for it would be like looking for a needle in a haystack. Perhaps you can help clarify that.
Content which this editor re-added to the article was published on another web site five months before I can find any evidence of its ever having appeared anywhere in Wikipedia.
Even if "the first paragraph" of the passage was not a copyright infringement, that has no bearing on whether the rest was.
If you have any evidence that the content added, despite apparent prior publication elsewhere, did not infringe copyright, that the impression of sockpuppetry was mistaken, or that any of the other reasons which have led me to take the action I have taken are mistaken, then please present that evidence for assessment. Simply asserting that it is so without explanation does not help me to see where I have made mistakes. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:41, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You "doubt that anyone bothered to tell the user about edit warring"? What do you call the plethora of warning templates and politely worded requests to stop their disruption above? Even if this account is not a sockpuppet, the block is justified on their disruptive behaviour alone. —Psychonaut (talk) 15:45, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]