User talk:KOmparos

tha se parakalousa entona na min alazis sinexos to intro sto site tou Panathinaikou. ine gegonos pos o PAO exi tous perisoterous titlous. ean sinexisis na sbinis ta dedomena tha me feris se thesi na zitiso apo ton admin na pari aftos tin ipothesi sta xeria tou. --Galis 13:53, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This message is regarding the page Panathinaikos. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.--cj | talk 15:10, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Olympiakos

While Olympiakos may have the biggest fanbase -- and in your opinion the 'most important' team in Greece -- it is not an unbiased "fact", as facts are not necessarily what one may imagine them to be. From my time residing in Athens, I would advise/remind you that there are plenty of fans of Panathinaikos and AEK who would debate (also biased) that their respective team is the 'biggest' and 'most important.' Biggest how? There are the same number of players on the team, and they aren't genetically any larger on average... so what do you mean biggest? While I understand that you feel strongly about your team, be advised that Wikipedia is not a fan forum, it is an information resource for thsoe that may not know one thing about Olympiakos, or Greek Soccer/Football/Podosphairo (Ποδόσφαιρο) . I applaud your passion, but I ask that in the name of being true to Wikipedian standards of being objective (vesrus relative to your own perspective as a fan), you refrain from making hyperbolic claims of the 'biggest' and 'most important.' Thank you. Ryecatcher773 20:36, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why it is wrong to be mentioned that Olympiakos is the biggest club and it is OK to write in Panathinaikos page that PAO is the biggest club? --KOmparos 07:26, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KOmparos, I would hope that in being a fan of what you and I both believe to be the best team in Greek football that you'd also share the maturity which accompanies such wisdom... who cares what the Gate 13 malakoi have to say? If it bothers you that they have to put out misinformation, then simply correct their page -- but do it JUDICIOUSLY, not in a vandalist way or in a childish way. Wikipedia isn't a fan post board, it's an encyclopedia. What should matter most is that your own favorite team's article reflects professionalism, not counterattacks on an obviously ignorant lot. Katalavaineis, vre? You and I are on the same team, I support your team spirit... just remeber -- first and foremost -- what Wikipedia is all about. Ryecatcher773 20:41, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, KOmparos, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--cj | talk 16:09, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Please remember to always provide an edit summary. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.--cj | talk 14:07, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning

Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.--cj | talk 14:07, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I add Olympiakos titles in sailing and swimming and somebody deletes that. Its my fault? --KOmparos 17:51, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They too were warned; I make no endorsement of any version. Wikipedia does not tolerate edit warring, and the three revert rule is policy, so please be aware of it.--cj | talk 05:33, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]