User talk:KOCOBO

leave me a message here. i will answer on this page. --KOCOBO 02:59, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Republika Srpska

No problem brother, I don't get why they keep removing the most simple details, like photos and the word "Serbian" or "Serbia". Isn't the hate of 1990s over? Seriously... --Svetislav Jovanović 07:04, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Let's not get into an edit war on the 3RR page. Just leave it as it is. The guy's made 7 reverts in about 70 minutes, either way that's not good for him. --estavisti 07:23, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tesla

I concur that he was Serb by nationality, but he spent most of his life in U.S. and he was also born in territories of today's Croatia... His nationality is allready mentioned in his bio! In his early years Sebian Orthodox Church is mentioned 4 times with no apparent need for it... but that were the facts that no one disputes... If we want to place all data everyone wents in first sentence, we just might open new article out of it! So, can't we leave it clean and simple... Name,(DOB,place(not country)-DOD,place(not country)) was world renowned inventor... would that satisfy you-- Vladimirko 10:23, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I haven't removed your reference from the first sentence altough it's duplicated, AND the file that is refference is full of incorrect data (just to name monument unrevealed in Zagreb it's THE ORIGINAL monument of Ivan Mestrovic moved from it's original location in front of Rudjer Boskovic Institute, not a new one). You use it only as a reference to his ethnicity, so please lookup for another more accurate refference file. You might look on Sava Kosanovic's pages or on Tesla's museum in Belgrade...-- Vladimirko 10:36, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please check up WHY your reference was removed, then argue, if you have something to argue with! Sorry, unfortunately I have no computer of my own, but if you have something to say, answer to me below!

Demographic History of Kosovo

If you are interested in this issue I encourage you to vote in the current survey on that talk page at Talk:Demographic_history_of_Kosovo#Poll, rather than always reverting Ferick. This way the support (adding the infobox) side would be in the majority anyway, so according to what he said Ferick should stop. TSO1D 14:52, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Excuse me,

Alright, now I know why you think he is removing content. As an experienced Wikipedian, let me tell you that what he is doing, and what you are doing is called POV pushing, which is when an editor wants his or her viewpoint to be heard exclusively. The only way to resolve this is by discussion with all editors concerned. For this to work, both of you need to lay off on the personal attacks (I have also warned Ferick.) If you want to convince Ferick that your viewpoint is "correct" (and I use that term warily), you need to find reputable, non-wikipedia sources to back you up. I highly reccomend the CIA World Factbook, as it contains much information about countries.--digital_m e^{(TalkˑContribs)} 16:40, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You keep breaking the 3RR rule

You keep breaking the 3RR rule [[1]]. When are you going to stop?Ferick 20:10, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo article

Don't worry - I'm simply giving Ferick enough rope to hang himself... -- ChrisO 07:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No personal attacks

Please don't make posts like this [2] or you'll get blocked for WP:NPA William M. Connolley 21:36, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon me? --KOCOBO 21:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, I won't. But don't repeat it or similar William M. Connolley 21:48, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ferick RfC

I've posted a user-conduct request for comments on Ferick following his latest bout of edit-warring - it's time to put an end to it. Please feel free to add your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Ferick. -- ChrisO 01:10, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Editor, I just removed the "users who do not understand this summary" section you created below Hipi Zhdripi's comments on the Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Ferick page (which got even signed by two other editors). Although his summary is rather incomprehensible, it is best to let everyone judge that by themselves and stating it like that is not very appropriate. If you really want to make a comment about it, I suggest you to that on the talk page of the RfC instead. Best regards, --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 07:34, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration request on Kosovo

Dear Editor, since you have been involved in editing the Kosovo article in the last months, and that article has been the subject of long ongoing edit wars, your name is listed in the Request for Arbitration on this matter. You can make a statement here: Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Kosovo. Due to the large number of editors involved, however, I would to ask you to keep your statement concise and to the point. If you feel you have not been substantially involved in the disputes surrounding the Kosovo article, please do not remove your name from the Arbitration request, but rather make a short statement there explaining why you feel you have not been involved enough to be part it. To understand my reasons for requesting Arbitration, please read my statement on the Requests for Arbitration page. Best regards, Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 10:16, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Voting

You may want to express your opinion here. --Svetislav Jovanović 01:20, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

University of Priština

Na Simple English Wikipedii nema članka University of Priština.Trebalo bi to iskoristiti da makar tamo napišemo clanak o našem univerzitetu. Andrija 18:44,September 3,2006

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Kosovo

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Kosovo. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Kosovo/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Kosovo/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, --Tony Sidaway 16:51, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject countering anti-Serb bias

Hi! I noticed that you are working on Kosovo-related topics, and having problems about it, so I believe you may want to join WikiProject countering anti-Serb bias I just created. Nikola 21:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lakse cemo sve to raditi ako se organizujemo. Ako nista drugo, makar se navedi u supporters. Ali ipak razmisli da se prikljucis i kao clan, ja nisam bio na Vikipediji jedno vreme i pre svega bi mogao da napravis spisak clanaka na kojima postoje problemi... Nikola 18:55, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support

You should support this. Cheers --TheFEARgod (listening) 12:01, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary injunction in the Kosovo arbitration

For the duration of this case, any of the named parties may be banned by an uninvolved administrator from Kosovo or related pages for disruptive edits.

You are receiving this message because you are one of those covered by this injunction.

For the arbitration committee. --Tony Sidaway 18:00, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Kosovo

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

For edit warring, personal attacks, and other disruption, PerfectStorm/C-c-c-c is banned from editing Wikipedia for one year. For edit warring and incivility, Bormalagurski is banned from editing Wikipedia from one year. For edit warring and disruptive use of sockpuppets, Dardanv under any username or IP, is banned from editing Wikipedia for one month.

Hipi Zhdripi is limited to his one named account, Hipi Zhdripi. All edits by Hipi Zhdripi under another account or an IP address shall be treated as edits by a banned user.

Ilir pz, Hipi Zhdripi, Vezaso are banned for one year from editing articles related to Kosovo. Relation to Kosovo is to be interpreted broadly so as to prevent gaming. Either may be banned from any related non-article page for disruptive editing. All articles related to Kosovo are put on Article probation to allow more swift dealing with disruption. Editors of Kosovo and related articles who engage in edit warring, incivility, original research, or other disruptive editing, may be banned for an appropriate period of time, in extreme cases indefinitely.

ChrisO is warned not to engage in edit warring, and to engage in only calm discussion and dispute resolution when in conflict. He is instructed not to use the administrative rollback tool in content disputes and encouraged to develop the ability and practice of assisting users who are having trouble understanding and applying Wikipedia policies in doing so. .

Dardanv, Ferick, Laughing Man, Osli73, and Tonycdp are placed on Probation for one year. Each may be banned from any page or set of pages for disruptive edits, such as edit warring or incivility.

Ilir pz, Hipi Zhdripi, Vezaso, Dardanv, Ferick, Laughing Man, Osli73, and Tonycdp are placed on standard revert parole for one year. Each is limited to one revert per article per week, excepting obvious vandalism. Further, each is required to discuss any content reversions on the article's talk page.

For the Arbitration Committee. Arbitration Committee Clerk, 03:44, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Education in Serbia

Pogledaj ovo kad budes imao vremena:Talk:Education in Serbia.

Andrija 12 JANUARY, 2007 2:29

Please use English

I noticed that you have posted comments on an article or user discussion page in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you are addressing your comments. This is because comments should be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. —Psychonaut 13:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Albanian_exodus

Kosovo, look at this article: Albanian_exodus.--Andrija 22:02, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

please note

please note the discussion on the biased name for war in croatia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Croatian_War_of_Independence, which is proposed to be moved to its original title.

Kosovo

Hi! Based on your interest in the Balkans, you may be interested in the currently ongoing debate on whether we should be using Kosovo or Kosovar/Kosovan as the adjective for Kosovo. DSuser 15:42, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Harsh much?

I hate Afrika paprika too, but not that much!

(P.S. No offense.)

--Gp75motorsports 15:19, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral point of view

Please, look at these comments:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Andrija.b#Don.27t_disrupt_articles, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ArberBorici#Neutral_point_of_view . --Andrija (talk) 13:43, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]