User talk:KNyholm

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.
(info: block log • contributions • deleted contributions • page moves • current autoblocks)

KNyholm account retired forever, because I got banned. It was stupid and pointless. Mea culpa, Rhinoracer. KNyholm 21:51, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the external links you added to the page Danny Hellman do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Rjd0060 04:22, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another sock bites the dust.

Let's see...that's two of your trolling socks banned so far. Soon to be three. I've removed the "retired" banner, as it was-- as shown in your contribution list-- a lie.

Rhinoracer 15:45, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for removing the "retired" banner. I'm now a constructive Wikipedia editor. Not a sock. KNyholm 10:24, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KNyholm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not a sock puppet. Now a constructive Wikipedia editor

Decline reason:

See [1]. Additionally, you don't seem to be denying that you are blocked user, Alex Buchet. As such, this is an abusive sockpuppet used to evade the block on that account. — Yamla 20:26, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this draft. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

KNyholm (talk · contribs)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KNyholm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Alex Buchet is a translator from France. I am not a translator from France. I am not Alex Buchet. I have never claimed to be Alex Buchet.

Decline reason:

And yet somehow these two edits by you are the same as this edit by Alex. Denied. — IrishGuy ^talk 21:09, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.