User talk:KMOuisch

January 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Yoshi Wada has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Yoshi Wada was changed by KMOuisch (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2021-01-02T16:16:59+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:17, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adriana Ivancich has been accepted

Adriana Ivancich, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Modussiccandi (talk) 17:44, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adriana Ivancich

Hi, I'm the editor who reviewed your draft Adriana Ivancich. Please try to give more precise references to sources in the future. I've fixed this myself in the article but I still wanted to give you a heads-up: you need to provide page numbers for any detail you extract from a source so that other users can retrace how you found it. Best, Modussiccandi (talk) 18:09, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]